Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 62, Issue 8
June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Beyond federated learning: fusion strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening algorithms trained from different device types
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SANDIPAN CHAKROBORTY
    Center for Applications and Research in India, Carl Zeiss India (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Krunalkumar Ramanbhai Patel
    Center for Applications and Research in India, Carl Zeiss India (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Alexander Freytag
    Corporate Research and Technology, Jena, Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   SANDIPAN CHAKROBORTY, Carl Zeiss India (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd. (E); Krunalkumar Ramanbhai Patel, Carl Zeiss India (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd. (E); Alexander Freytag, Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 85. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SANDIPAN CHAKROBORTY, Krunalkumar Ramanbhai Patel, Alexander Freytag; Beyond federated learning: fusion strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening algorithms trained from different device types. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):85.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common causes of blindness, and a screening using fundus images helps to detect DR at early stage. Various types of fundus cameras are available today, with differences in their image quality, portability, and field of view. To screen a large population, it is essential to develop an automated DR screening system that is device agnostic. We evaluate how different, device-specific solutions can be fused when the training data and underlying algorithms differ.

Methods : From previous studies, we obtained two deep learning models with different model architecture. One model (MHH) was trained exclusively on fundus images captured with a low-cost hand-held fundus camera (VISUSCOUT®100;ZEISS,Jena, Germany). The second model (MTT) was trained on fundus images recorded with different table-top fundus cameras manufactured by various companies.
We evaluated individual models and combination strategies on two datasets: one from hand-held cameras (VISUSCOUT®) and one from table-top cameras (seen in Messidor-2 dataset). We analyzed three fusion techniques: score level fusion, decision level combination, and system level combination. For the weighted score level combination, the optimum weights were found experimentally between 0 to 1. In decision level combination, a modified OR logic was used for referable DR. For the system level combination, the metadata of the image was used to find out whether the image was captured using VISUSCOUT or a table-top fundus camera for routing the image to the appropriate algorithm. These strategies are visualized in Fig. 1.

Results : Fig. 2 shows the diagnostic efficacy in AUC %. Every single model performs well in the data regime it was trained on (MHH on data from hand-held cameras, MTT on table-top camera data) but accuracy drops significantly when tested with data coming from different device. For fusing both models into a single system, we observe best screening results with score level fusion, being clearly superior to decision level or system level fusion and insensitive to the data type.

Conclusions : DR screening systems which have been trained on different device data and with different deep learning models can be fused with various combination techniques for higher system performance.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Fig. 1 Different systems for algorithm combinations

Fig. 1 Different systems for algorithm combinations

 

Fig 2. AUC scores obtained with different fusion strategies

Fig 2. AUC scores obtained with different fusion strategies

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×