June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Regional Mechanical Deformation of Human Corneal Stroma during Intraocular Pressure Elevation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicholas Hazen
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Biophysics Interdisciplinary Group, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Keyton Clayson
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Biophysics Interdisciplinary Group, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Sunny Kwok
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Xueliang Pan
    Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Jun Liu
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nicholas Hazen, None; Keyton Clayson, None; Sunny Kwok, None; Xueliang Pan, None; Jun Liu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant R01EY025358
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 771. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicholas Hazen, Keyton Clayson, Sunny Kwok, Xueliang Pan, Jun Liu; Regional Mechanical Deformation of Human Corneal Stroma during Intraocular Pressure Elevation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):771.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To quantify and analyze regional variations of mechanical strains within the corneal stroma in human donor globes during intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation using high-frequency ultrasound speckle tracking.

Methods : Ten globes from 9 human donors were obtained (age: 41-76 years old, 5 male and 4 female). Treatment with poloxamer 188 (3.5-4.25%) was used to return corneas to their physiological hydration as described previously (Clayson et al, EER, 2019). The globes were inflated from 5 to 30 mmHg in intervals of 0.5 mmHg. At each IOP level, an ultrasound scan was acquired using a 50 MHz probe (MS700, FujiFilm VisualSonics) from the central 9.73 mm of the cornea along the nasal-temporal meridian. Tissue displacements were calculated using ultrasound speckle tracking and strains were calculated using least squares estimation (Tang and Liu, JBME, 2012). The corneal stroma was divided into two regions, central and paracentral as shown in Fig 1a. The deformation of these two regions was compared using paired t-tests.

Results : Strains measured at 30 mmHg were recorded for all 10 globes. Tangential strain in the corneal stroma was significantly larger in the paracentral (1.8±1.5%) than the central (0.40±1.1%) zone (p = 0.0022, Fig 1b, Fig 2a). Radial strain was not significantly different between these two zones (–2.1±1.9% vs –1.9±1.0%, p = 0.73, Fig 1c, Fig 2b). Shear strain magnitude was also not significantly different between zones (2.7±1.2% vs 3.1±2.2%, p = 0.49, Fig 1d, Fig 2c).

Conclusions : High-frequency ultrasound elastography enabled quantification of the different types of deformation through corneal stroma, showing tangential stretch, radial compression, and shear during IOP elevation. The central cornea was subject to lower tangential stretch but similar radial compression and shear as compared to the paracentral cornea. The finding of lower tangential strain in the central cornea was consistent with previous reports of corneal surface deformation using optical methods.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1: Illustration of corneal zone division (a) and representative corneal strain maps from a human donor eye (b-d).

Figure 1: Illustration of corneal zone division (a) and representative corneal strain maps from a human donor eye (b-d).

 

Figure 2: Comparison of strains between central and paracentral zones. *: P<0.05.

Figure 2: Comparison of strains between central and paracentral zones. *: P<0.05.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×