June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
A Hybrid Deep Learning System to Distinguish Late Stages of AMD and to Compare Expert vs. Machine AMD Risk Features
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kaveri Thakoor
    Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Darius Bordbar
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Jiaang Yao
    Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Omar Moussa
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Weijie Lin
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Ioana Scherbakova
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Vlad Diaconita
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Paul Sajda
    Biomedical Engineering, Radiology (Physics), Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Royce Chen
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kaveri Thakoor, None; Darius Bordbar, None; Jiaang Yao, None; Omar Moussa, None; Weijie Lin, None; Ioana Scherbakova, None; Vlad Diaconita, None; Paul Sajda, None; Royce Chen, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE 1644869); National Eye Institute Core Grant P30EY019007; unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2146. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kaveri Thakoor, Darius Bordbar, Jiaang Yao, Omar Moussa, Weijie Lin, Ioana Scherbakova, Vlad Diaconita, Paul Sajda, Royce Chen; A Hybrid Deep Learning System to Distinguish Late Stages of AMD and to Compare Expert vs. Machine AMD Risk Features. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2146.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To train and characterize the effectiveness of a hybrid deep learning system that combines Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA), OCT structural data, and foveal OCT b-scans to distinguish between normal eyes, eyes with non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and eyes with neovascular AMD. To also determine retinal pathology features most predictive of neovascular AMD diagnosis.

Methods : We used 346 retrospective OCTA scans from patients 18 years and older; 97 were diagnosed with no significant vascular pathology (non-AMD), 169 with non-neovascular AMD, and 80 with neovascular AMD with actionable choroidal neovascularization (CNV). For each patient, an OCTA volume and an OCT structural volume were created using deep retinal, avascular, outer retina and choriocapillaris, choriocapillaris, and choroid layers as input for a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN); foveal OCT b-scans were used as input for a 2D CNN. Hybrid CNNs were constructed and trained respectively on: (1) OCTA, (2) OCTA and OCT structure, (3) foveal OCT b-scans, and (4) OCTA, OCT structure, and foveal OCT b-scans combined (Figure [1]). Each CNN’s performance was evaluated via accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score. In addition, multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictive importance of 5 retinal features (adjudicated for presence by OCTA experts) for final AMD diagnosis by experts and by CNNs: (1) intra/sub-retinal fluid (IRF/SRF), (2) scarring, (3) geographic atrophy, (4) CNV, and (5) pigment epithelial detachment.

Results : The CNN achieving highest test accuracy of 77.8% for this 3-class detection task combined OCTA and OCT structure. Next came the CNN combining OCTA, OCT structure, and foveal OCT b-scans at 75.2% accuracy. The model combining all 3 modalities had slightly higher precision, recall, and F-1 score for the neovascular AMD class. For CNNs, IRF/SRF was an important predictor for neovascular AMD vs. non-AMD eyes; the CNN was able to predict IRF/SRF presence with up to 82.4% accuracy.

Conclusions : Just as experts rely on both OCTA and OCT structure to diagnose AMD, CNNs also performed best when trained on OCTA and OCT structure combined. IRF/SRF, known to be an important predictor for neovascular AMD diagnosis by experts, was found to be important by CNNs as well and was detected with high accuracy. [1] Thakoor et al., ISBI 2021

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×