June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Comparison of GCL and GCIPL Measures for Detection of Early Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi Nezhad
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Vahid Mohammadzadeh
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Jack Martinyan
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Kiumars Edalati
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Bingnan Zhou
    Department of Computer Science, California State University Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Dariush Yaldazadeh
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Maryam Mirzaei
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Navid Amini
    Department of Computer Science, California State University Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Joseph Caprioli
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
    Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi Nezhad, None; Vahid Mohammadzadeh, None; Jack Martinyan, None; Kiumars Edalati, None; Bingnan Zhou, None; Dariush Yaldazadeh, None; Maryam Mirzaei, None; Navid Amini, None; Joseph Caprioli, None; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi, an unrestricted Departmental Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (F), Heidelberg Engineering (R) (F), NIH R01 grant (EY027929), (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1824. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi Nezhad, Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Jack Martinyan, Kiumars Edalati, Bingnan Zhou, Dariush Yaldazadeh, Maryam Mirzaei, Navid Amini, Joseph Caprioli, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Comparison of GCL and GCIPL Measures for Detection of Early Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1824.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Test the hypothesis that macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) measurements are able to detect early damage better than ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness.

Methods : First cohort included 84 glaucoma eyes with visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) ≥–6 dB and 129 normal eyes. 8x8 GCL and GCIPL macular grids were exported and 5 superior and inferior macular sectors were defined (Figure 1). Areas-under-ROC curves (AUC) for sectoral GCL and GCIPL measures were compared.
A second cohort of 98 glaucoma and 48 normal/glaucoma suspect (GS) eyes with GMPE macular scans had GCL/GCIPL deviation maps analyzed. Proportion of areas with abnormal (<5%/1% cutoffs) and supernormal thickness (>95%/99%ile cutoff) was estimated on deviation maps (Figure 2). Differences in extent of abnormal and supernormal regions were compared in glaucoma and normal/GS subjects.

Results : In the first cohort, average VF MD was –3.0±1.8 dB in glaucoma eyes. Inferior sector 2 thickness performed best for detection of glaucoma with both GCL and GCIPL (AUCs=0.895; p>0.05). VF MD was –2.3±1.7 dB in glaucoma eyes in the second cohort. In the central elliptical area, extent of GCL damage at <5% and 1% cutoffs was 27.4%±26.0% and 15.2%±20.6% vs. 26.7%±26.4% and 14.6%±20.6% for GCIPL, respectively, in glaucoma eyes (p=0.01 and =0.02, Figure 2a); the extent of GCL and GCIPL supernormal regions were similar (p=0.87). In normal eyes, extent of GCL abnormality at 5% and 1% cutoffs were 16.0%±18.9% and 5.9%±10.7% vs. 15.0%±18.4% and 5.3%±10.5% for GCIPL (p=0.07 and =0.01); GCL and GCIPL supernormal areas were similar (p=0.93). Results for the entire scan area were similar (Figure 2b). Extent of abnormality at <1% cutoff best predicted glaucoma (AUC=0.730 vs. 0.700 for GCL vs. GCIPL).

Conclusions : Macular GCL deviation maps are more likely than GCIPL to flag abnormality with acceptable specificity; however, the difference is clinically unremarkable. GCL and GCIPL sectoral thickness are equivalent for detection of glaucoma.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×