June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Consequences of Treatment Lapse in Retinal Vein Occlusion Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Injections
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jessica Carolina Liu
    Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Peter Alsaloum
    Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Amogh Iyer
    Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Peter Kaiser
    Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
  • Rishi P. Singh
    Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jessica Liu, None; Peter Alsaloum, None; Amogh Iyer, None; Peter Kaiser, None; Rishi Singh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH-NEI P30 Core Grant (IP30EY025585)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3188. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jessica Carolina Liu, Peter Alsaloum, Amogh Iyer, Peter Kaiser, Rishi P. Singh; Consequences of Treatment Lapse in Retinal Vein Occlusion Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Injections. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3188.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are first-line therapy for retinal vein occlusion (RVO). However, it is challenging for patients to maintain appropriate care due to the high frequency of injections required for anti-VEGF therapy. This study examines the response of retinal biomarkers to lapses in anti-VEGF treatment in RVO patients.

Methods : A retrospective chart review evaluated patients with branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) at the Cleveland Clinic from January 2012 to June 2020. Patients 18 or older were divided into two cohorts: RVO patients with no lapse in anti-VEGF treatment (control group) and RVO patients with a lapse ≥3 months (lapse group). Notably, patients on treat-and-extend or pro re nata protocols were excluded. Central subfield thickness (CST) and visual acuity (VA) were collected at baseline, the first appointment post-lapse, and at 3, 6, and 12 month follow up appointments. Relationships between continuous variables were assessed using t-tests while relationships between categorical variables were assessed using Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher Exact tests.

Results : Lapse patients (n=69) and control patients (n=69) had similar baseline CST (347.7±127.8µm vs 365.6±139.4µm, p=0.436) and VA (64.1±20.6 ETDRS vs 58.9±20.2 ETDRS, p=0.588). Lapse patients experienced a significant increase in CST after discontinuing anti-VEGF therapy (lapse: 398.7±191.3µm, control 338.9±119.9µm, p=0.034). This persisted 12 months post-lapse and after re-initiation of anti-VEGF agents (lapse: 381.6±161.1µm, control: 307.5±95.4µm, p=0.017). Lapse patients also experienced a decrease in VA after lapse (lapse: 54.5±25.0 ETDRS, control: 64.7±17.5 ETDRS, p<0.001) that recovered after 6 months.

Conclusions : Patients with BRVO or CRVO with any lapse in treatment are at risk for poorer outcomes. Though VA normalizes upon treatment resumption, patients experience a statistically and clinically significant increase in CST that does not recover. Further analysis may focus on the impact of persistent anatomic change present 1 year after anti-VEGF resumption.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1: Mean values of CST and visual acuity (ETDRS) in control versus lapse group over time. * represents statistical difference between groups (p<0.05).

Figure 1: Mean values of CST and visual acuity (ETDRS) in control versus lapse group over time. * represents statistical difference between groups (p<0.05).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×