June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Inferring retinal ganglion cell light response properties from intrinsic electrical feature
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Moosa Zaidi
    Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Gorish Aggarwal
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
    Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Nishal P. Shah
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Orren Karniol-Tambour
    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States
  • Georges Goetz
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Sasi Madugula
    Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
    Neurosciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Alex R. Gogliettino
    Neurosciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Eric G. Wu
    Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Alexandra Kling
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Nora Brackbill
    Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Alexander Sher
    Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States
  • Alan M. Litke
    Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States
  • E.J. Chichilnisky
    Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Moosa Zaidi, None; Gorish Aggarwal, None; Nishal Shah, None; Orren Karniol-Tambour, None; Georges Goetz, None; Sasi Madugula, None; Alex Gogliettino, None; Eric Wu, None; Alexandra Kling, None; Nora Brackbill, None; Alexander Sher, None; Alan Litke, None; E.J. Chichilnisky, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Stanford Medical Scholars Fellowship Program (MZ), Pew Charitable Trusts (AS), Research to Prevent Blindness Stein Innovation Award, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute Big Ideas, NIH NEI R01-EY021271, NIH NEI P30-EY019005 (EJC).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3167. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Moosa Zaidi, Gorish Aggarwal, Nishal P. Shah, Orren Karniol-Tambour, Georges Goetz, Sasi Madugula, Alex R. Gogliettino, Eric G. Wu, Alexandra Kling, Nora Brackbill, Alexander Sher, Alan M. Litke, E.J. Chichilnisky; Inferring retinal ganglion cell light response properties from intrinsic electrical feature. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3167.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : An ideal epiretinal implant for treating vision loss would stimulate each retinal ganglion cell (RGC) of each distinct type according to its natural function, to reproduce the neural code of the retina. However, no methods exist to determine the normal, healthy light response properties of each RGC of each type in a region of retina that is no longer light-responsive. This study presents a method to infer a model of RGC light responses using only intrinsic features of recorded electrical activity.

Methods : Analysis was performed on 283 recordings from populations of ON and OFF parasol RGCs in isolated macaque retina using 512-electrode arrays. The type of each recorded RGC was determined from its light responses. To emulate interfacing to a blind retina, a classifier was used to infer the type (ON or OFF) of each cell using two features of recorded electrical activity, without reference to the light stimulus: the average electrical image (EI) of a spike over the electrode array, and the autocorrelation function (ACF) of spike times. EIs were also used to infer receptive field locations. A linear-nonlinear Poisson (LNP) light response model was then inferred for each cell using its true cell label, its estimated location, and the average spatiotemporal filter and nonlinearity in the population. The prediction accuracy of inferred models and models fitted to measured responses was compared, for white noise and natural scenes stimuli (Fig. 1).

Results : K-means (k=2) clustering of the top 2 principal components of ACFs reliably separated ON and OFF parasol cells in individual retinas. However, cluster labels (ON, OFF) could not be reliably determined from ACFs, due to inter-retina variability. Instead, ACF clusters were labeled using “votes” from a cell-by-cell linear classifier of selected EI features. This approach achieved 94% mean accuracy on 25 test retinas. Across six retinas, the RGC light response models produced a mean correlation between inferred models and data of 0.48 and 0.51, and between fitted models and data of 0.63 and 0.57 (an upper bound), for white noise and natural scenes stimuli respectively.

Conclusions : Intrinsic features of electrical activity can be used to infer RGC light response models.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. Example rasters of light responses measured (data), predicted from an inferred light response model (infer), or predicted from a light response model fitted to recorded data (fit).

Figure 1. Example rasters of light responses measured (data), predicted from an inferred light response model (infer), or predicted from a light response model fitted to recorded data (fit).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×