Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 62, Issue 8
June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Developing a deep learning classifier for uveitis scoring on mouse OCT images
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sarah John
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Jessica Jeni Na
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Shreya Swaminathan
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Leslie Wilson
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Yue Wu
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Kathryn Pepple
    Opthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sarah John, None; Jessica Na, None; Shreya Swaminathan, None; Leslie Wilson, None; Yue Wu, None; Kathryn Pepple, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01EY030431, Research to Prevent Blindness career development award, Unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2115. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah John, Jessica Jeni Na, Shreya Swaminathan, Leslie Wilson, Yue Wu, Kathryn Pepple; Developing a deep learning classifier for uveitis scoring on mouse OCT images. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2115.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To develop and validate an automated approach to scoring OCT images of ocular inflammation in experimental animals using deep learning.

Methods : Ocular inflammation was generated using the primed mycobacterial uveitis (PMU) model. Anterior chamber and posterior chamber optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were obtained using the Envisu R2300. On each image, degree of inflammation was classified using a 6 step categorical system with scores ranging from 0-4+ by three masked graders (A). Training set images were labeled with the score assigned by at least 2 out of the 3 graders. Images were divided into a training, validation and test set in a 80:10:10 ratio and a Deep Learning classifier algorithm based on a modified ResNet50 but allowing higher resolution images, was developed. Accuracy of the classifier compared to the human score was determined for anterior and posterior chamber images separately. Agreement between the classifier and the human graders was determined using Cohen’s linear weighted Kappa. Comparison between human and classifier scores was performed using a confusion matrix on the test set.

Results : 1115 images (575 anterior chamber, 540 posterior chamber) were scored by human graders. Agreement between human graders was 0.87 and 0.83 on AC and PC images respectively. Agreement between the automated classifier and the human graders was 0.56 and 0.68 for AC and PC respectively. Absolute accuracy of the automated classifier was 56% for AC images and 57% for posterior images. The confusion matrix analysis (B) determined that accuracy was highest for scores of 0 which was also the most frequent score in the training set.

Conclusions : In this study, we found that human graders demonstrated strong agreement if one step differences inscore were accounted for with a weighted kappa. This is consistent with prior studies of inter-human agreement scoring in uveitis. Automated classification did not perform as well as human graders. Better performance and agreement between the automated and human graders was identified for posterior chamber images than on anterior chamber images. Performance was likely limited by the disproportionate number of score 0 images in the training set. Additional images at each score level will be required to improve classification accuracy.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

A. Representative OCT images for all scores
B. Confusion Matrix Analysis

A. Representative OCT images for all scores
B. Confusion Matrix Analysis

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×