June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Image Restoration Algorithms for OCT Images of the Optic Nerve Head: Performance comparison between OCT-GAN and Compensation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Haris Cheong
    OEIL, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • Satish Kumar Panda
    OEIL, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • Tin Aung
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • Michael J.A. Girard
    OEIL, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Haris Cheong, None; Satish Panda, None; Tin Aung, None; Michael Girard, Abyss Processing (S)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Funds Tier 1 (R-155-000-168-112 to AT;R-397-000-294-114 to MJAG); National University of Singapore Young Investigator Award Grants (NUSYIAFY16 P16, R-155-000-180-133 to AT; NUSYIA FY13 P03, R-397-000-174-133 to MJAG); Singapore Min-istry of Education Academic Research Funds Tier 2 (R-397-000-280-112, R-397-000-308-112 to MJAG); andNational Medical Research Council Grant NMRC/STAR/0023/2014 (TA)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1787. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Haris Cheong, Satish Kumar Panda, Tin Aung, Michael J.A. Girard; Image Restoration Algorithms for OCT Images of the Optic Nerve Head: Performance comparison between OCT-GAN and Compensation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1787.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To perform both qualitative and quantitative analysis of OCT-GAN and Compensation algorithms for shadow removal from Single-frame optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans.

Methods : 2,328 OCT B-scans (75x averaging) and 2,328 single-frame B-scans were acquired through the center of the optic nerve head (ONH) using Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) for both eyes of 13 subjects. Extracted features from three perceptual loss networks pre-trained on Imagenet datasets were used with manual segmentations of retinal shadows (where 1 represented a shadow pixel and 0 represented a lack thereof) to train a generative adversarial network (referred to as OCT-GAN) to simultaneously remove retinal shadows and speckle noise. OCT-GAN and OCT compensation were then used on 97 single-frame OCT B-scans from one OCT volume and results were compared qualitatively (for shadow removal and speckle noise) and quantitatively using layerwise pixel intensities (LPI), an indicator for brightness of a specific retinal layer, and the intralayer contrast (ILC), a measure of shadow visibility ranging from 0 (shadow-free) to 1 (strong shadow). ILC was computed in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) layer and LPI was computed for the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), the Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL) + Inner Plexiform Layer (IPL), the Inner Nuclear Layer (INL), and the Outer Plexiform Layer (OPL).

Results : The mean ILC decreased from 0.40 ± 0.087 to 0.10 ± 0.074 (74.3 ± 19.2%) vs 0.21 ± 0.17 (51.0 ± 36.1%) for OCT-GAN and OCT compensation respectively, indicating shadow removal for both techniques. LPI increased by 4.34 ± 3.66%, 4.58 ± 4.36%, 8.29 ± 6.91%, 0.4 ± 3.80% for OCT-GAN but decreased by 56.0 ± 12.9%, 70.0 ± 7.70%, 74.3 ± 7.30%, 69.7 ± 15.6% for compensation for the RNFL, GCL+IPL, INL, and OPL layers,respectively. OCT-GAN images had visibly less speckle than compensated images and lacked artifacts commonly found in compensated images (inverted shadows, hyper-reflective spots, noise over-amplification at high depth). Both OCT-GAN and compensation were unable to completely remove large retinal shadows.

Conclusions : OCT-GAN had better shadow removal in the RPE layer and did not suffer from layer dimming commonly observed with compensation. Both algorithms could be considered as pre-processing steps to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of glaucoma from OCT images.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×