June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Fitting Simplified Models to Machine Learning-Identified Tear Film Breakup
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rayanne A Luke
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Richard J Braun
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Tobin Driscoll
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Dominick Sinopoli
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Vishruta Yawatkar
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Luyang You
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Aashish Phatak
    Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
  • Carolyn Begley
    School of Optometry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rayanne Luke, None; Richard Braun, None; Tobin Driscoll, None; Dominick Sinopoli, None; Vishruta Yawatkar, None; Luyang You, None; Aashish Phatak, None; Carolyn Begley, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NSF DMS 1909846
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1315. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rayanne A Luke, Richard J Braun, Tobin Driscoll, Dominick Sinopoli, Vishruta Yawatkar, Luyang You, Aashish Phatak, Carolyn Begley; Fitting Simplified Models to Machine Learning-Identified Tear Film Breakup. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1315.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Six ordinary differential equation (ODE) tear film breakup (TBU) models are created to capture evaporation, osmosis, and different types of flow. A convolutional neural network designed after Su et al. (IEEE, 2018) and trained on over 40,000 image patches successfully identifies TBU and non-TBU in fluorescent (FL) images gathered in vivo with an accuracy of 92%. The ODE models are fit to the automatically identified TBU FL intensity data by optimizing TBU quantities such as evaporation and tangential flow rates. Best-fit determination of TBU parameters suggests which mechanisms cause the thinning.

Methods : The FL intensity data was originally recorded from 25 normal subjects with 20 trials taken over two visits (Awisi-Gyau, Indiana University thesis, 2020). We extract the experimental FL image data from the centers of TBU regions identified by a convolutional neural network. These are fit with the models designed to mimic evaporation-driven, tangential flow-driven, and combination thinning. We estimate parameters using a least squares minimization of the difference between experimental and computed intensities using the trust region-reflective method. Theoretical intensity dependent on tear film (TF) thickness and FL concentration was based on Nichols et al (2012, IOVS, 53:5426). Separate procedures were used to estimate initial FL concentration and localized TF thickness (Wu et al, IOVS 2015, 56:4211). The fits use up to four parameters: evaporation rate v, a (steady) and b1 (decaying) extensional flow rates, and decay rate b2. All computations are via custom Python programs.

Results : Optimal evaporation rates fall near or within experimental ranges (Nichols et al, IOVS, 2005). An example fit is shown in the Figure. The best-fit model determines that the evaporation rate is -3.25 μm/min and that the instance exhibits strong, outward tangential flow that decays, allowing evaporation to take over in importance.

Conclusions : Intensity decay in automatically identified TBU areas can readily be fit with simplified models that capture essential thinning dynamics and yield physically relevant quantities. This procedure can be applied to a wide range of instances to obtain statistical information that cannot be directly measured during breakup.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Left: Automatically identified TBU instances. Right: Best-fit results for the six ODE models for the box 10 TBU (indicated by arrow in left image).

Left: Automatically identified TBU instances. Right: Best-fit results for the six ODE models for the box 10 TBU (indicated by arrow in left image).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×