June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Saccades during smooth pursuit in macular degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Natela M Shanidze
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Zachary Lively
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Rachel Lee
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Anca Velisar
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Preeti Verghese
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Natela Shanidze, None; Zachary Lively, None; Rachel Lee, None; Anca Velisar, None; Preeti Verghese, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01 EY022394, R01 EY027390 to PV & F32 EY025151, R00 EY026994 to NS
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3547. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Natela M Shanidze, Zachary Lively, Rachel Lee, Anca Velisar, Preeti Verghese; Saccades during smooth pursuit in macular degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3547.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Saccades and smooth pursuit are inextricably linked, particularly in cases of low gain, where saccades can help bring the fovea back on target. Individuals with macular degeneration (MD) have compromised foveas due to central field loss, which impacts both fixation stability and saccades, as well as the interaction between the saccade and pursuit systems. To investigate how saccades associated with pursuit are affected, we conducted a quantitative analysis of binocular smooth pursuit eye movement data collected for a prior study (Shanidze et al., 2016) of smooth pursuit in MD. Here we extend that work by characterizing saccadic intrusions in MD participants during pursuit and pre-pursuit fixation.

Methods : We examined saccade frequency, magnitude, and direction across viewing conditions for MD (7, 4F) and control participants (4, 1F). Participants were asked to pursue a 1° annular target, moving in a step ramp (6° step, 12° ramp) in one of 6 directions (4 cardinal & 2 oblique). Saccades were detected offline when eye velocity exceeded 40°/s, or acceleration exceeded 150 (°/s2) and confirmed manually by an experimenter during the fixation and pursuit portions of each trial.

Results : Individuals with MD made significantly more saccades during fixation and pursuit than controls (Fig F). During pursuit, both control and MD participants made saccades aligned with the target direction. However, MD participants also made saccades in non-target directions (Fig A-D). To quantify this difference, we computed the anisotropy index (a comparison of saccades aligned with and orthogonal to the target, Fig E). We found controls had a significantly higher anisotropy index than MDs, indicating greater alignment with target direction.

Conclusions : Our analysis suggests that despite higher frequency, a large number of saccades during pursuit in MD participants are not in the target direction, and thus are not catch-up saccades that serve to keep the eye on the target. The saccades in non-target directions appear to be associated with the significant increase in saccades during fixation. Thus, MD participants do not effectively use saccades to compensate for the lower pursuit gains reported previously.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Raw saccade distributions & saccade frequencies relative to target direction, stacked by saccade magnitude. MD: A, C; Control: B, D. E. Anisotropy Index (AI), MD: blue; Control: red. F. Per participant saccade number during pursuit & fixation.

Raw saccade distributions & saccade frequencies relative to target direction, stacked by saccade magnitude. MD: A, C; Control: B, D. E. Anisotropy Index (AI), MD: blue; Control: red. F. Per participant saccade number during pursuit & fixation.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×