June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Resident Performed MIGS Outcomes at a Veterans Hospital
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amanda Lehman
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Elana Meer
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Tianyu Liu
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Eydie Miller
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Amanda Lehman, None; Elana Meer, None; Tianyu Liu, None; Eydie Miller, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3441. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amanda Lehman, Elana Meer, Tianyu Liu, Eydie Miller; Resident Performed MIGS Outcomes at a Veterans Hospital. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3441.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To explore the comparative safety and efficacy of evolving MIGS procedures/devices, the Hydrus, Kahook, and iStent in the Philadelphia VA population to guide future decision-making about the most suitable glaucoma treatment in a resident-training population with diverse demographics.

Methods : A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent a Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) operation in conjunction with cataract surgery at the Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical center from approximately 01/01/2015 – 11/1/2020. Descriptive analyses, ANOVA and chi-squared analyses were performed to compare across MIGS types.

Results : 126 patients undergoing MIGS procedure were included. 96% were male, 69.84% African-American, and 29.36% Caucasian. 46.03% patients received a Hydrus, 31.75% an iStent, and 22.22% a Kahook. The average preoperative maximum intraocular pressure was 23.78 mmHg, with an average preoperative IOP of 15.78 mmHg and an average preoperative drop number (total number of glaucoma medications used per day) of 1.45, not significantly different across MIGS types. When separated out by MIGS used, Hydrus demonstrated the greatest reduction in IOP, on average a reduction of 6.14 mmHg at initial post-operative visit and 4.08 mmHg at final post-operative visit, a statistically significant decrease in intraocular pressure when compared to both the iStent and the Kahook (p < .05) at postoperative day 1 and postoperative week 1. However, at the 9-12 months postoperative visit the Hydrus was only statistically significantly better at reducing IOP compared to the iStent, and performed similarly to the Kahook. The Hydrus demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in medication reduction (either frequency or number) when compared to both the Kahook and iStent (p< .05). There were no significant differences in complication rates across MIGS types.

Conclusions : Overall, this study suggests that Hydrus may be more efficacious than the iStent and the Kahook initially in decreasing glaucoma medication use and IOP postoperatively, however, this difference may not be statistically significant in longer term follow up. More studies are needed to evaluate outcomes in glaucoma populations of different severities.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Table 1 ANOVA Comparison of Postoperative IOP Reduction by Device at each Visit

Table 1 ANOVA Comparison of Postoperative IOP Reduction by Device at each Visit

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×