June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Macular Neovascularization Associated with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Multimodal Imaging-Based Predictors
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thamolwan Surakiatchanukul
    Ophthalmology, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York Medical College, New York, United States
  • Supriya Arora
    Princess Margaret Hospital, Nassau NP, Bahamas
  • Dmitri Maltsev
    Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Sumit Singh
    Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Niroj Kumar Sahoo
    LV Prasad Eye Institute Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, Vijayawada, India
  • Deepika Parameshwarappa
    LV Prasad Eye Institute Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, Vijayawada, India
  • Alexei Kulikov
    Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Claudio Iovino
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • Filippo Tatti
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • Ramkailash Gujar
    Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
  • Ramesh S Venkatesh
    Department of Retina and Vitreous, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, India
  • Nikitha Reddy
    Department of Retina and Vitreous, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, India
  • Ram Snehith
    Department of Retina and Vitreous, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, India
  • Enrico Peiretti
    Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • Marco Lupidi
    Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
  • Jay Chhablani
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Thamolwan Surakiatchanukul, None; Supriya Arora, None; Dmitri Maltsev, None; Sumit Singh, None; Niroj Sahoo, None; Deepika Parameshwarappa, None; Alexei Kulikov, None; Claudio Iovino, None; Filippo Tatti, None; Ramkailash Gujar, None; Ramesh Venkatesh, None; Nikitha Reddy, None; Ram Snehith, None; Enrico Peiretti, None; Marco Lupidi, None; Jay Chhablani, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 650. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Thamolwan Surakiatchanukul, Supriya Arora, Dmitri Maltsev, Sumit Singh, Niroj Kumar Sahoo, Deepika Parameshwarappa, Alexei Kulikov, Claudio Iovino, Filippo Tatti, Ramkailash Gujar, Ramesh S Venkatesh, Nikitha Reddy, Ram Snehith, Enrico Peiretti, Marco Lupidi, Jay Chhablani; Macular Neovascularization Associated with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Multimodal Imaging-Based Predictors. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):650.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate predictors for macular neovascularization (MNV) associated with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) based on multimodal imaging

Methods : Retrospective multi-center chart review study of 134 eyes of 128 consecutive patients with CSCR. Eyes were classified per the multimodal imaging-based classification of CSCR at baseline into i) simple/ complex CSCR & ii) primary episode/ recurrent/ resolved CSCR. Baseline characteristics of MNV and predictors were evaluated with ANOVA.

Results : Of the 134 eyes with CSCR, MNV was present in 32.8% (n=44). Based on severity, those with MNV primarily consisted of complex (72.7%, n=32), followed by simple (22.7%, n=10), and atypical (4.5%, n=2) types. Those without MNV, in contrast, were more commonly simple (55.6%, n=50) than complex (44.4%, n=40). Compared with complex CSCR with MNV cohort, simple CSCR with MNV had a better baseline decimal visual acuity (0.72 vs 0.49, p=0.03) without differences in age (mean 59 vs 59 years, p=0.76), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT 393 vs 390 μm, p=0.997), and reported duration of symptoms (median 6 vs 18 weeks, p=0.38).

Based on presentation, those with MNV were as likely to be primary (45.5%, n=20) as recurrent (45.5%, n=20), with the rest as resolved cases (9.1%, n=4). No differences between primary, recurrent vs resolved cohorts were found in age (mean 58, 61 vs 52, p=0.27), visual acuity (mean 0.56, 0.50 vs 0.65, p=0.66), SFCT (414, 383 vs 329 μm, p=0.55), and duration (median 7, 7 vs 30, p=0.42). However, primary CSCR with MNV were older (58 vs 47, p=0.00003), worse visual acuity (0.56 vs 0.75, p=0.01), and of longer duration (median 7 vs 1, p=0.0002) than those without MNV. Similarly, recurrent CSCR with MNV were older (61 vs 52, p=0.004), without differences in visual acuity (0.50 vs 0.61, p=0.31), SFCT (383 vs 424 μm, p=0.21), and duration (median 7 vs 2, p=0.32) than those without MNV. Further analysis of MNV characteristics in each subgroup and predictive modeling is underway.

Conclusions : Prevalence of MNV associated with CSCR was 32.8% and more likely in complex CSCR and older age. Complex CSCR with MNV also had worse baseline visual acuity than simple CSCR with MNV and complex CSCR without MNV. Primary and recurrent presentations were similarly accounted for nearly half of MNV cases. Multimodal imaging-based classification of CSCR supports detailed analysis of associated MNV.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×