June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Myopic choroidal neovascularization: prognostic factors with a PRN regimen of Anti-VEGF therapy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alicia Canalejo
    Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
  • Maribel Lopez-Galvez
    Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
    Instituto de Oftalmobiologia Aplicada, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
  • Maria Fe Muñoz Moreno
    Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alicia Canalejo, None; Maribel Lopez-Galvez, None; Maria Fe Muñoz Moreno, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 636. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alicia Canalejo, Maribel Lopez-Galvez, Maria Fe Muñoz Moreno; Myopic choroidal neovascularization: prognostic factors with a PRN regimen of Anti-VEGF therapy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):636.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the short and long-term efficacy of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) intravitreal therapy with a Pro Re Nata (PRN) approach in the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and to investigate the correlation of basal risk factors with treatment outcomes, in order to individualize treatment.

Methods : Observational, retrospective study of 91 patients (28 men and 63 women) treated with Anti-VEGF therapy due to neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia for a 1 to 6 years period. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) before and after treatment were analyzed. The mean number of injections in the first year, and during the whole treatment period was assessed. Additionally, prognostic factors for Anti-VEGF treatment were identified such as age, baseline visual acuity, localization and anatomic features of CNV studied by OCT, as well as treatment considerations.

Results : Mean (SD) age at onset was 67.9 (14.4) years. The BCVA (logMAR) improved from 0.72 at baseline to 0.53 one month after the first injection, it remained stable in 0.53 after three months. BCVA after 6 years was 0.58 (p< 0.05 in all cases). A reduction of 47.96µm (p< 0.05) in CRT was observed in OCT three months after treatment. The mean number of injections during the first year was 3.05, and 3.65 for the complete follow-up period. BCVA improved 3 lines in young patients, compared to 1 line in patients over 60 years (p= 0.115). One month after treatment, BCVA in subfoveal CNV changed from 0.85 to 0.66 (p< 0.05), whereas in yuxtafoveal CNV it improved from 0.58 to 0.39 (p< 0.05). Type 2 CNV demonstrated a better response to treatment (from 0.71 to 0.56) than type 1 CNV (from 0.75 to 0.62), p< 0.05.

Conclusions : Anti-VEGF therapy has demonstrated efficacy in the short and long-term with a significant improvement in BCVA and in CRT. The PRN regimen or “as needed” is appropriate and includes a more individualized treatment approach. Advanced age, poor baseline visual acuity and subfoveal localization worsen prognosis. However, further studies are needed in order to identify which patients would benefit from a more intensive therapy in the long term.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×