June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
CRISPR base editing as a potential therapeutic approach for Kir7.1 channelopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Meha Kabra
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Pawan K Shahi
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • ALLISON SPILLANE
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Yuyuan Wang
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Divya Sinha
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Gregory A Newby
    Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Shivani Saxena
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Krishanu Saha
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Mariya Moosajee
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • David Gamm
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • David R. Liu
    Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Shaoqin Gong
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Bikash R Pattnaik
    Departments of Pediatrics, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    McPherson Eye Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Meha Kabra, None; Pawan Shahi, None; ALLISON SPILLANE, None; Yuyuan Wang, None; Divya Sinha, None; Gregory A Newby, None; Shivani Saxena, None; Krishanu Saha, None; Mariya Moosajee, None; David Gamm, None; David R. Liu, None; Shaoqin Gong, None; Bikash Pattnaik, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1483. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Meha Kabra, Pawan K Shahi, ALLISON SPILLANE, Yuyuan Wang, Divya Sinha, Gregory A Newby, Shivani Saxena, Krishanu Saha, Mariya Moosajee, David Gamm, David R. Liu, Shaoqin Gong, Bikash R Pattnaik; CRISPR base editing as a potential therapeutic approach for Kir7.1 channelopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1483.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Leber Congenital Amaurosis 16 (LCA16) is a severe form of inherited ocular channelopathy caused by point mutations in KCNJ13, which affect the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE). AAV-gene therapy related immune responses, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing associated off-targets, and unintended indels pose some challenges in clinical use of such treatments. We used Adenosine and Cytosine CRISPR base editors (ABE and CBE) for proof-of-concept correction of KCNJ13 point mutations (c.158G>A [p.W53X] and c.431T> C [p.L144P]) using nanoparticle-mediated delivery to induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE (iPSC-RPE).

Methods : Base editing was carried out using either ABE or CBE mRNA with a guide RNAs specific to the W53X or L144P mutant allele. A HEK293-FRT stable cell line expressing Kir7.1-L144P and Kir7.1- W53X were base edited via electroporation using CBE and ABE mRNA respectively. LCA16-W53X patient-specific fibroblasts and iPS-RPE cells were also targeted with ABE mRNA delivered using nanoparticles. Base editing efficiency, protein expression, localization, and channel function were assessed in edited cells and were compared with non-edited mutant and WT cells. Potential off-targets were screened to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of CRISPR BEs.

Results : CBE mRNA for L144P correction in HEK cells resulted in 66% editing. The degenerate nature of codons for provides additional flexibility to correct L144P point mutation. Higher rate (~24%) were observed in treated L144P-cells due to multiple bystander cytosines at the targeted locus.

ABE mRNA for W53X (TaG>TgG) correction in HEK stable cells showed 50% editing efficiency than RNP approaches (25% efficiency). Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of ABE-mRNA and sgRNA in fibroblasts (47% editing) and iPSC-RPE (20% editing) established its use for in vivo BE delivery. Control fibroblast cells lacking the mutant allele showed about 1% indels. On target indel mutagenesis (<3%) and deep sequencing of potential off-target sites (<1%) indicated high accuracy of the ABEs. Electrophysiology assays demonstrated robust rescue of channel function in the edited iPSC-RPE cells.

Conclusions : Our results show application of CRISPR base editing for precise correction of point mutations with reduced off-targets compared to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Restoration of channel function in edited iPSC-RPE cells suggests potential of CRISPR BE as a treatment for childhood blindness.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×