June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Prevalence of hyper-response to CAE challenge in dry eye disease
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • George W Ousler
    Ora, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States
  • Michael Watson
    Ora, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States
  • Divya Narayanan
    Ora, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, United States
  • Garrick Wallstrom
    SDC Clinical, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   George Ousler, Ora (E); Michael Watson, Ora (E); Divya Narayanan, Ora (E); Garrick Wallstrom, SDC Clinical (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1272. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      George W Ousler, Michael Watson, Divya Narayanan, Garrick Wallstrom; Prevalence of hyper-response to CAE challenge in dry eye disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1272.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : It has been previously reported that patients with dry eye disease (DED) who exhibit a rapid symptomatic response to the Ora CAE® challenge demonstrate enhanced investigational treatment differences as well as a reduction of placebo effects in clinical studies. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence of this CAE hyper-response across treatment naïve dry eye patients.

Methods : Data from 1209 DED patients were analyzed. The CAE is a controlled chamber which allows for highly standardized atmosphere of low relative humidity, increased airflow, and constant visual tasking. This controlled environment overcomes a dry eye subject’s ability to maintain a stable tear film and allows for reproducible evaluation of signs and symptoms of dry eye. Each subject’s ocular discomfort is documented using the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort scale (0 = none to 4 = worst) before and periodically during the 90 minutes CAE challenge. A subject is defined as a CAE hyper-responder if their ocular discomfort worsens to 3 or greater (or to 4 if 3 at time 0) in less than 20 min in CAE (considered a more symptomatic patient or hyper-responder) versus ≥ 20 minutes in CAE (i.e. not hyper-responder). For each study, number of subjects identified as hyper-responders were documented and percentage was calculated.

Results : Among the 1209 subjects, 496 (41%) were identified as CAE hyper-responders and 713 (59%) were not hyper-responders to the CAE. Overall reproducibility of subjects meeting these criteria at more than one CAE challenge was 787/1209 (65%). When considering a 10 min. window of the 90 min. challenge for re-qualification, CAE hyper-responders reproduced 79% of the time.

Conclusions : Hyper-response to CAE is a phenomenon well-documented across a large number of patients. An individual DED patient’s inherent sensitivity to respond to a challenge might be a contributing factor and indicator of their ability to report symptoms and better distinguish treatment differences. Additional study is ongoing to identify specific individual characteristics that might be a related to exhibiting hyper-response on CAE. A hyper-response to the CAE as an inclusion criterion or pre-defined subpopulation may result in patient enrichment in dry eye clinical trials.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×