June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Prevalence of diabetic macular edema diagnosed with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Peng Yan
    Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • James Im
    University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Ronald Chow
    Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Ontario, Canada
  • Yaping Jin
    Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Peng Yan, None; James Im, None; Ronald Chow, None; Yaping Jin, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1143. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peng Yan, James Im, Ronald Chow, Yaping Jin; Prevalence of diabetic macular edema diagnosed with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1143.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss among people of working age with diabetes. It is a major public health issue. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) technology allows for accurate assessment of DME but systematic reviews on the prevalence of DME diagnosed based on OCT are lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the global prevalence of DME diagnosed with OCT.

Methods : Three electronic databases (EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed) were searched on May 25, 2020 using key words such as “diabetic macular edema”, “prevalence” and “optical coherence tomography”. The quality of retrieved studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Pooled prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model following the assessment of heterogeneity (I2).

Results : The search found 1524 studies. After removing duplicates, 1245 studies remained. After abstract screening and full-text assessment based on pre-established criteria, six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The sample size of included studies ranged from 75 to 978 patients, with a mean age of 50.6-68.2 years. Four studies had more females (51.1%-61.5%). The other two studies had predominantly males (64.5% and 74.4%). Three studies were conducted in developed countries and three studies in developing countries. The prevalence of DME ranged from 4.0% to 48.7% among individual studies. The associated I2 value was 98.9%, suggesting that the random effects model was appropriate to combine individual studies. The pooled prevalence of DME was 17.9% (95% CI: 5.4%-35.5%) overall, 18.6% (95% CI 7.7%-32.8%) in developed countries and 17.7% (95% CI: 1.0%-47.7%) in developing countries. In comparison, using fundus photography exams, a meta-analysis published in 2012 reported a pooled prevalence of DME of 6.81%.

Conclusions : The prevalence of DME diagnosed based on OCT was 18%, which was 2-3 times higher than the prevalence of DME diagnosed with fundus photography. Modern OCT technology allows for early detection of DME before significant vision loss. Given the global pandemic of diabetes mellitus and obesity, there is an increasing need to inform physicians and educate people with diabetes regarding early detection and treatment of DME based on OCT.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×