June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on the treatment choice between aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Felix Goldbach
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Georgios Mylonas
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Bilal Haj Najeeb
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Gabor Deak
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Martin Michl
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Jonas Brugger
    Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS), Medizinische Universitat Wien Universitatsklinik fur Innere Medizin I, Wien, Austria
  • Bianca S Gerendas
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
    Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medizinische Universitat Wien, Wien, Wien, Austria
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Felix Goldbach, None; Georgios Mylonas, None; Bilal Haj Najeeb, None; Gabor Deak, None; Martin Michl, None; Jonas Brugger, None; Bianca S Gerendas, IDx (F), Novartis (C), Roche (C); Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Genentech (C), Heidelberg Engineering (C), Kodiak (C), Novartis (C), RetInSight (C), Roche (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1040. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Felix Goldbach, Georgios Mylonas, Bilal Haj Najeeb, Gabor Deak, Martin Michl, Jonas Brugger, Bianca S Gerendas, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on the treatment choice between aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1040.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the impact of baseline vitreomacular interface (VMI) status and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy on treatment outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

Methods : Post hoc analysis of prospective randomized 12-month multicenter clinical trial data from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. The source of the data is the DRCR Retina Network, but the analyses, content and conclusions presented herein are solely the responsibility of the authors and have not been reviewed or approved by DRCR Retina Network. In this study, 660 patients with DME were randomly assigned to aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Optical coherence tomography images from patients who completed the month 12 visit of the study were analyzed at the baseline and at the last visit to identify the presence of total vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome and total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Grading for all the above-mentioned variables were made by two trained and certified readers of the Vienna Reading Center.

Results : Six hundred sixty eyes (660 patients) were randomized in the Protocol T study. Six hundred twenty-nine were eligible for this post hoc analysis based on the study criteria. Total adhesion patient group gained 3.7 more ETDRS letters whereas patients with partial VMA gained 3.1 more ETDRS letters on average compared to the total PVD group at the end of the 12 months follow up (p<0.001). Baseline VMI status had no significant influence on CST at the 12 months visit (p=0.144). All three investigated agents used in the Protocol T study showed equal effectiveness on the improvement of VA and on the reduction of macular edema, independently of baseline VMI status.

Conclusions : This study adds evidence that the VMI status impacts functional outcomes in patients with DME treated with anti-VEGF agents. Patients with total or partial VMA at baseline may derive greater improvements in visual acuity after anti-VEGF treatment compared with those with total PVD.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×