June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Spectral Domain and Swept Source OCT Angiography Devices in Retinal Diseases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Moying Wang
    Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    Ophthalmology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • Jun Kong
    Ophthalmology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • J Fernando Arevalo
    Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Neil M Bressler
    Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Moying Wang, None; Jun Kong, None; J Fernando Arevalo, Allergan Inc (C), Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (C), bv/Dutch Ophthalmic (C), DORC International (C), Springer SBM LLC (F), Topcon Medical Systems Inc. (F); Neil Bressler, Bayer (F), Biogen (F), Genentech/Roche (F), Novartis (F), Regeneron (F), Samsung Bioepis (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Unrestricted research funds to the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine for macular degeneration and related diseases research.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2487. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Moying Wang, Jun Kong, J Fernando Arevalo, Neil M Bressler; Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Spectral Domain and Swept Source OCT Angiography Devices in Retinal Diseases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2487.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare retinal vascular and foveal avascular zone morphology on OCT-angiography (OCTA) images and macular OCT images in subjects with retinal or choroidal abnormalities using two different OCT-angiography devices.

Methods : The retina of 31 study eyes of 21 participants with retinal or choroidal abnormalities including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal occlusion underwent fovea-centered 3×3mm and 6×6mm volume scans using the Topcon DRI-OCT Triton Swept-source OCT and Optovue RTVue-XR. The device-software generated en-face OCT-A images of the superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexuses (DCP) and OCT images. By using the automatic segmentation, vessel length density (VLD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, foveal avascular zone perimeter of OCTA images in the SCP and DCP and foveal center point thickness of 6 patterns of OCT images using image J software were compared between devices.

Results : After skeletonization of vessels to remove variation related to vessel width, mean (95% CI) difference of VLD between Topcon and Optovue was 8.40% (5.7%-1.1%, P<.001) and 3.33% (0.9%-5.7%, P=.008) in the SCP and DCP of 3×3mm volume scans, respectively. The mean difference of VLD was 7.72% (5.35%-10.09%, P<.001) and 8.93% (5.97%-11.88%, P<.001) in the SCP and DCP of 6×6mm volume scans, respectively. The mean difference of FAZ area was -0.17mm2 (-0.25--0.10, P<.001) and 0.31mm2 (0.20-0.42, P<.001) in the SCP and DCP of 3×3mm volume scans, respectively. The mean difference of FAZ area was -0.04mm2 (-0.24-0.15, P=.647) and 0.62mm2 (0.39-0.85, P<.001) in the SCP and DCP of 6×6mm volume scans, respectively. The mean difference of FAZ perimeter was -0.76mm (-1.22--0.31, P=.002) and 0.94mm (0.47-1.42, P<.001) in the SCP and DCP of 3×3mm volume scans, respectively. The mean difference of FAZ perimeter was -0.14mm (-0.62-0.34, P=.540) and 1.40mm (0.95-1.84, P<.001) in the SCP and DCP of 6×6mm volume scans, respectively.

Conclusions : These findings suggest VLD on Optovue was smaller than that on Topcon in either SCP or DCP on both volume of scans. FAZ area and perimeter in SCP on Optovue appeared larger than that on Topcon, but smaller in DCP. Further studies would be needed to determine if these differences are clinically relevant and how they vary across diseases, patients, and eye characteristics.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×