June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Significance of Incidental Imaging Signs of Intracranial Hypertension with Corresponding Fundus Photography: A Prospective Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Benjamin I Meyer
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Benson S Chen
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Amit M Saindane
    Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Beau B Bruce
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Nancy J Newman
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Valerie Biousse
    Neuro-Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Benjamin Meyer, None; Benson Chen, None; Amit Saindane, None; Beau Bruce, None; Nancy Newman, None; Valerie Biousse, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  V.B. and N.J.N. are supported in part by NIH/NEI core grant P30-EY06360 (Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine), and by NIH/NINDS (RO1NSO89694)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2388. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Benjamin I Meyer, Benson S Chen, Amit M Saindane, Beau B Bruce, Nancy J Newman, Valerie Biousse; Significance of Incidental Imaging Signs of Intracranial Hypertension with Corresponding Fundus Photography: A Prospective Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2388.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : MRI signs suggesting intracranial hypertension are common in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), but are also incidentally detected in asymptomatic patients and those with primary headache syndromes, prompting neuro-ophthalmology consultations and investigations. We aimed to prospectively identify the prevalence and significance of MRI signs of intracranial hypertension (MRI-IH) in patients imaged for any clinical indication.

Methods : Prospective study evaluating 296 consecutive patients undergoing outpatient brain MRI and non-mydriatic fundus photography immediately following MRI. Photographs were reviewed for papilledema and MRIs read for MRI-IH. Univariate analysis with Fisher’s exact test or t-test was performed.

Results : Indications for MRI were brain neoplasm (27.7%), multiple sclerosis (MS)/MS-mimics (18.6%), seizure (17.9%), headache (8.8%), and other non-headache neurologic symptoms (19.6%). Four patients (1.4%) had known IIH. MRI-IH (N, %) included: empty sella (98, 33.1%); enlarged Meckel cave (47, 15.9%); meningocele/cephalocele (4, 1.4%); transverse venous sinus stenosis (TSS) (7/198, 3.6%); cerebellar tonsillar ectopia (4, 1.4%); scleral flattening (2, 0.7%); increased perioptic CSF (32, 10.8%); and increased optic nerve tortuosity (23, 7.8%). Overall, 51% patients exhibited no MRI-IH, 32.8% one sign, 10.8% two signs, 3.7% three signs, and 1.7% had ≥four signs. Five patients (1.7%) had definite papilledema on fundus photographs; two (0.7%) had questionable papilledema. Patients with definite papilledema had significantly increased average BMI (37.6 vs 27.5 kg/m2; P=0.038), history of IIH (40% vs 1%; P=0.001), increased optic nerve tortuosity (60% vs 7%;P=0.004), TSS (50% vs 3%; P=0.006), and ≥four MRI-IH (40% vs 1%; P=0.002), compared to patients without papilledema. Other MRI-IH were not significant, nor were having one, two, or three signs.

Conclusions : MRI-IH were encountered in almost half the patients in this prospective study of outpatients undergoing brain MRI for various clinical indications. However, definite papilledema was only detected in 1.7% patients, questioning the need to perform systematic investigations for patients with incidentally detected MRI-IH.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×