June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
A Non-Contact Corneal Aesthesiometer (NCCA) Validation Study in Normal Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ahmed Amayem
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Centre de Recherche, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Hamid Ebrahimi Orimi
    Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Centre de Recherche, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Sharifa Beroual
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Centre de Recherche, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Charles-Édouard Giguère
    Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en sante mentale de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Christos Boutopoulos
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Centre de Recherche, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Isabelle Brunette
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Centre de Recherche, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ahmed Amayem, None; Hamid Orimi, None; Sharifa Beroual, None; Charles-Édouard Giguère, None; Christos Boutopoulos, None; Isabelle Brunette, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This modified NCCA device designed to measure corneal sensitivity has excellent repeatability. It is compact, portable, user-friendly, and it reveals inter-subject differences that are not detected with the traditional CBA, making it a useful tool for corneal sensitivity assessment in clinical practice and research.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2030. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ahmed Amayem, Hamid Ebrahimi Orimi, Sharifa Beroual, Charles-Édouard Giguère, Christos Boutopoulos, Isabelle Brunette; A Non-Contact Corneal Aesthesiometer (NCCA) Validation Study in Normal Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2030.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Validation of a modified version of an NCCA (NCCAm) and comparison with the Cochet Bonnet Aesthesiometer (CBA) in subjects with normal corneas.

Methods : The NCCA device described by Murphy et al (1996, 1998) to measure corneal sensitivity was modified as follows: The air reservoir was placed outside the enclosure and the fan inside, and a 3-way solenoid valve was used to save space. An adapter for the Goldmann tonometer was designed to hold the nozzle to ease accessibility at a standard slit lamp. A 250 µm filter was added to the patient line as a precaution against dust and contaminants. A user-friendly calibration feature was implemented while a manual valve was added to the exhaust line to ensure equalization of pressure in the exhaust and patient lines. The device allows for fine pressure adjustments down to 0.02 mbars. The configuration chosen was a 0.5 mm nozzle diameter, 0.9 second puff duration and 1 cm distance to cornea.

The left eye central corneal sensitivity of 21 subjects (12 females) was tested using the NCCAm and the CBA gold standard was used for comparison. The NCCAm pressure started at 0.01 mbar (subthreshold) and increased in 0.02 mbar intervals until the participant felt the stimulus (ascending threshold). Then the pressure was decreased until the patient no longer felt a stimulus and the last felt pressure was recorded (descending threshold). The mean of the two measurements was their NCCAm result. This was repeated for 3 rounds at 5 minute intervals.

Results : All CBA measurements were normal (6.0 cm). The NCCAm ascending threshold was repeatedly higher (mean 0.06 mbars; p<0.001) than the descending threshold, but this difference was stable (linear mixed-effect model: F=0.5, df=2, p=0.62). Furthermore, an intra-class analysis (ICC) showed an excellent agreement between the three rounds (ρICC = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.83-0.95]). NCCAm mean (±SD) threshold values of 0.177±0.045 mbar ranging from 0.085 to 0.532 mbar were obtained. Consistent with Murhpy 1996, the NCCAm allows corneal sensistivity measurement below the detection threshold of CBA.

Conclusions : The NCCAm is a compact user-friendly device enabling reliable corneal sensitivity measurements. It also allows the detection of inter-subject differences that are not detected with the traditional CBA.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×