June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Fast subjective estimation of astigmatism with the Direct Subjective Refraction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Victor Rodríguez-Lopez
    Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez
    Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Dorronsoro
    2EyesVision, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Victor Rodríguez-Lopez, ID 100010434; LCF/BQ/DR19/11740032 (F), P190451ES (P); Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, None; Carlos Dorronsoro, 2EyesVision (I), 2EyesVision (E), P190451ES (P), PCT/2014ES/070725 (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  ID 100010434; LCF/BQ/DR19/11740032
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2913. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Victor Rodríguez-Lopez, Eduardo Esteban-Ibañez, Carlos Dorronsoro; Fast subjective estimation of astigmatism with the Direct Subjective Refraction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2913.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The subjective estimation of astigmatism, part of the subjective refraction, is a tiresome procedure. Here we extend the Direct Subjective Refraction (DSR), a technology to obtain fast and unsupervised subjective measurements of the refractive error, to estimate astigmatism

Methods : In the DSR method, a temporal defocus wave (TDW; fast and periodic changes in defocus induced by a tunable lens projected onto the eye) interacts with the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye. The flicker and color artifacts that appear on a stimulus, are minimum when TDW matches the retinal plane, so the patients can find subjectively their refractive error, unsupervised, with a staircase procedure. The stimulus for astigmatism is a set of magenta, red and blue lines, tested parallel and perpendicular to the axis of astigmatism reported by an autorefractometer (ARK1 Nidek). The TDW was produced by a visual simulator (SimVisGekko 2EyesVision) with frequency 15Hz and amplitude 0.5D. 4 subjects (25-49yo) performed the DSR with free accommodation in both eyes, 4 repetitions, 2 axes. The mean difference between axes provided the amount of astigmatism (J0, J45). DSR was compared with traditional subjective refraction (TSR) performed by an optometrist. Visual function with the DSR and the TSR corrections were evaluated with VisualAcuity (VA), StereoAcuity (SA), and direct comparison of perceived visual quality

Results : DSR was able to measure small astigmatisms with high repeatability (SD average across repetitions and subjects ±0.13D). Comparing DSR with TSR, M, J0 and J45 components showed high correlation (p=5e-16, 5e-12, 9e-12; r=0.98, 0.98, 0.94). The mean difference in astigmatism (J0:0.08±0.11D, J45:0.01±0.06D) and the 95%CI Limits of Agreement (J0:[-0.14 to 0.30], J45:[-0.11 to 0.14] D) have subclinical importance. Both final refractions produce similar VA (mean difference -0.1±0.01logMAR; paired t-test p=0.35) and SA (29±8’’; p=0.4). On average, TSR takes 4.9±1.5 min while each repetition of DSR takes 47 seconds (per eye, including sphere). In direct comparisons, 50% of subjects preferred the final correction with DSR over with TSR

Conclusions : Using temporal defocus waves, DSR is able to measure astigmatism, providing similar values than the TSR, but more repeatable. Each unsupervised DSR measurement (sphere and astigmatism) takes less than one minute, allowing clinicians to spend more time evaluating other visual aspects

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×