June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Investigation on the Efficacy and Safety of Carteolol/Latanoprost Combination Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Timolol/Latanoprost Combination Ophthalmic Solution in Patients with Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yuta Saito
    Ophthalmology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
    Shinanozaka Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
  • Junichiro Kizaki
    Ophthalmology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
    Shinanozaka Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
  • Yoshihiro Wada
    Ophthalmology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
    Shinanozaka Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
  • Masaki Suginaka
    Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan
  • Yoshiyuki Shibasaki
    Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan
  • Nobuharu Kishimoto
    Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan
  • Makoto Aihara
    Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yuta Saito, Alcon Pharma (R), Kowa (R), Otsuka (F), Otsuka (R), Pfizer (R), Santen (R), Senju (R); Junichiro Kizaki, None; Yoshihiro Wada, None; Masaki Suginaka, Otsuka (E); Yoshiyuki Shibasaki, Otsuka (E); Nobuharu Kishimoto, Otsuka (E); Makoto Aihara, Alcon Japan (F), Alcon Japan (C), Alcon Pharma (F), Alcon Pharma (C), AMO (F), AMO (C), Glaukos (F), Glaukos (C), Kowa (F), Kowa (C), Nippon Tenganyaku (F), Nippon Tenganyaku (C), Novartis (F), Novartis (C), Otsuka (F), Otsuka (R), Otsuka (C), Pfizer (F), Pfizer (C), Santen (F), Santen (C), Senju (F), Senju (C), TOMEY (F), Wakamoto (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2750. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yuta Saito, Junichiro Kizaki, Yoshihiro Wada, Masaki Suginaka, Yoshiyuki Shibasaki, Nobuharu Kishimoto, Makoto Aihara; Investigation on the Efficacy and Safety of Carteolol/Latanoprost Combination Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Timolol/Latanoprost Combination Ophthalmic Solution in Patients with Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2750.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the impact of the instillation timing of carteolol hydrochloride/latanoprost combination ophthalmic solution (LCFC), in the morning or at night, in patients with glaucoma on the diurnal variations of IOP and on the circulatory system, comparing with timolol/latanoprost combination ophthalmic solution (LTFC) as a control.

Methods : Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients with POAG or OH on monotherapy with a prostaglandin ophthalmic solution were included. They were randomly assigned to either a group of switching from LCFC to LTFC or a group of switching from LTFC to LCFC. Both drugs were administered at 8 p.m. every night for 2 months each.
At the start of evaluation, the diurnal variation in IOP, vital signs (pulse rate, blood pressure), fluorescein corneal staining test and ophthalmological subjective symptoms at 2 months after the start of administration of each ophthalmic solution were evaluated. The adverse events during the evaluation period were also surveyed.

Results : The diurnal variation in IOP at 2 months after the start of evaluation period showed a similar transition in the LCFC group and the LTFC group, with a maximum value of 16.21 mmHg and 16.55 mmHg at a.m. 4:00 and a minimum value of 13.06 mmHg and 12.42 mmHg at p.m. 4:00, respectively. There were no differences in the range of the diurnal variation and the changes from the start of evaluation.
For the diurnal variation in pulse rate at 2 months after the start of evaluation period, there were significant differences in the changes from the start of evaluation, i.e., -0.8 and -4.3 at 22:00, -2.6 and -7.0 at 2:00, -3.1 and -7.1 at 4:00, and -3.7 and -8.0 at 6:00 in the LCFC group and the LTFC group, respectively.
No adverse events with a causal relationship with the treatment occurred in the both groups.

Conclusions : The IOP-lowering effect was equivalent in the diurnal variation of IOP at 2 months after the start of the administration in the LCFC group and the LTFC group. The transitional changes were similar, showing the maximum IOP at a.m. 4:00. For the diurnal variation at 2 months after the start of the administration, the pulse rate is less affected in the LCFC group, and the safety of night instillation was shown.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×