June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Cost-benefit analysis of orientation and mobility programs for adults with vision-related disability: a contingent valuation study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lisa Keay
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Kuo-yi Jade Chang
    The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Blake Angell
    The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    UCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Kris Rogers
    The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Stephen Jan
    The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lisa Keay, None; Kuo-yi Jade Chang, None; Blake Angell, None; Kris Rogers, None; Stephen Jan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Guide Dogs NSW/ACT
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3617. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lisa Keay, Kuo-yi Jade Chang, Blake Angell, Kris Rogers, Stephen Jan; Cost-benefit analysis of orientation and mobility programs for adults with vision-related disability: a contingent valuation study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3617.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Orientation and Mobility (O&M) programs aim to equip individuals with vision disability with the skills and techniques that optimize their ability for safe, independent travel, and hence foster their social, economic and educational participation. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis from three perspectives: the general public, the experienced user and the potential users of O&M programs in Australia.

Methods : Willingness-to-pay, was collected via contingent valuation survey using a double-bound dichotomous choice approach. The survey had three arms: Arm 1, the general public via stratified random sampling, Arm 2, experienced users of O&M programs, and Arm 3, potential users of O&M programs, were drawn from a major O&M service provider’s database and two eye clinics via convenience sampling. Willingness-to-pay was estimated using interval regression analyses, accounting for study arm, sex, occupation, income and self-rated health. The cost data, including labour, travel and occupancy costs, were estimated from a service provider’s perspective. The Net Present Value, variation if delivered by tele-O&M programs and priority for resource allocation was investigated.

Results : Arm 1 (the general public) included 471 participants (60.7% female) with a mean age of 64.6 years (range 18 - 100); Arm 2 (the experienced user) included 96 participants (59.4% female) with a mean age of 61.9 years (range 19 - 97); and Arm 3 (the potential user) included 137 participants (59.9% female) with a mean age of 74.2 years (range 21 - 97). Overall, the adjusted mean Net Present Value of O&M programs was $3857 (95%CI: $3760 - $3954) per client, with a highest NPV from the general public ($4289, 95% CI: $ 4185 - $4392), followed by the experienced users ($ 3158, 95% CI: $ 2897 - $3419) and the potential users ($ 2867, 95% CI: $ 2680 - $3054). The NPV reached break-even for tele-O&M programs. Priorities for resource allocation were similar between O&M programs, low vision services and care worker assistance.

Conclusions : There was strong community support for investment into O&M programs, including tele-programs. The results of this survey indicated that investment into these programs generates substantial benefits for clients over and above the cost of providing the services.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×