June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Visual motion perception predicts postural sway in older adults with and without vision impairment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joanne M Wood
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Callula Killingly
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • David Elliott
    University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Alex A Black
    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Joanne Wood, None; Callula Killingly, None; David Elliott, None; Alex Black, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC 1008145
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3549. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joanne M Wood, Callula Killingly, David Elliott, Alex A Black; Visual motion perception predicts postural sway in older adults with and without vision impairment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3549.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Accurate perception of body position relative to the environment through visual motion cues provides sensory input to control postural sway. Importantly, the role of visual motion information in older adults is not well established. This study evaluated the extent to which visual motion perception affects postural sway in older adults with and without vision impairment and the interaction with physical function.

Methods : Participants included 234 older adults with vision impairment from a range of eye diseases (mean age =72.6 ± 7.2 years) and 204 with normal vision (71.6 ± 5.7 years). Participants completed a series of vision tests including binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual fields and central motion sensitivity, as well as physical function tests to assess aspects of physical frailty and functional mobility, including walking speed, Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) and grip strength. Postural sway (path length, mm) was measured using an electronic forceplate (HurLabs) on a firm and foam surface with eyes open. Linear regression analysis was used to identify visual predictors of postural sway and moderated linear regression explored whether this relationship was moderated by physical frailty.

Results : Linear regression models indicated that of the vision tests, impairments in motion sensitivity were most strongly associated with increased sway on foam (standardized β = 0.330; p<0.001), while of the physical function tests, TUGT (standardized β = 0.334; p<0.001) was most strongly associated with sway on foam, where poorer functional mobility was associated with increased sway. A moderated linear regression demonstrated significant main effects of motion sensitivity and TUGT for sway on foam (p<0.001), as well as a significant interaction effect (standardised β = 0.164, p<0.001), such that the relationship between motion sensitivity and sway became stronger when TUGT performance was poorer.

Conclusions : A combination of impaired motion perception and reduced physical function negatively impact on postural stability in older adults with and without vision impairment. This finding provides insight into the visual input to postural stability in older adults and its interactions with other sensory and physical impairments and has implications for the assessment of falls risk in older adults.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×