June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Impaired visual field while wearing mouth-nose masks in normal eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Antonio Bergua
    Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
  • Annika Weber
    Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
  • Bettina Hohberger
    Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Antonio Bergua, None; Annika Weber, None; Bettina Hohberger, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3492. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Antonio Bergua, Annika Weber, Bettina Hohberger; Impaired visual field while wearing mouth-nose masks in normal eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3492.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The major route of infection of SARS-CoV-2 is supposed to be the respiratory way. Thus, mouth-nose masks are requested to prevent the viral transmission. The aim of the present study was to investigate, if wearing a mouth-nose mask impaired visual field function in normal eyes.

Methods : 30 healthy eyes of 30 subjects were recruited. Visual field function was tested by white-on-white perimetry (OCTOPUS 900; 90°). Sensitivity thresholds were analysed in 14 defined test points (P1-P14, inferior visual field) under 3 different test conditions while wearing a nose-mouth mask: (I) position 1: 1.5cm under the lower eyelid, nose clip not used; (II) position 2: 1.5cm under the lower eyelid, nose clip correctly positioned; (III) position 3: 0.5 cm under the lower eyelid, nose clip correctly positioned. All data were compared to sensitivity thresholds without wearing a nose-mouth mask (reference). Mean D was calculated as difference between each test condition and reference, respectively. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and was done in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Results : Mean sensitivity was not significantly different between all three test conditions (26.6±2.4 dB (I); 28.3±2.4 dB (II); 27.8±2.2 dB (III) and reference (28.5±2.4 dB), respectively. Subgroup analysis for test points P1-P14 yielded significantly different sensitivity thresholds between test condition (I) and reference at test point P3 – P12 (p≤0.005). Sensitivity thresholds at test point P7 were significantly different between test condition (II) and (III) compared to reference (p<0.001), respectively. Mean D increased while wearing a mask at P7 in test condition (II) < (III) < (I) (-8.3±7.3 dB; -11.3±9.5 dB; -20.1±7.6 dB).

Conclusions : Visual field function was significantly impaired inferior-nasal while wearing a nose-mouth mask in normal eyes, especially if the nose clip was not used correctly.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×