June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Using a handheld facial vibration device is associated with reduction in pain associated with onabotulinumtoxinA injections for Benign Essential Blepharospasm
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicolaas P DeRuyter
    Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Yuhan Liu
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Qingxia Chen
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Behin Barahimi
    Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nicolaas DeRuyter, None; Yuhan Liu, None; Qingxia Chen, None; Behin Barahimi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3348. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicolaas P DeRuyter, Yuhan Liu, Qingxia Chen, Behin Barahimi; Using a handheld facial vibration device is associated with reduction in pain associated with onabotulinumtoxinA injections for Benign Essential Blepharospasm. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3348.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Strategies to mitigate pain associated with periorbital onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) injections for Benign Essential Blepharospasm (BEB) are insufficient in the current era. We conducted a randomly controlled trial to test the hypothesis that using a handheld facial vibration device would improve BOTOX injection associated pain for patients with BEB.

Methods : Adults 18 or older with a clinical diagnosis of BEB were randomized to receive facial vibration with the handheld Yeamon vibration device (frequency = 100Hz) to only one side of their face (right vs. left) during periorbital BOTOX injections. Following treatment, subjects completed a pain rating survey scaled 1-10 (1 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) for each side of the face. Baseline demographic data was collected. Pain rating between treatment and control was compared using linear mixed effect model regression.

Results : 21 patients participated in the trial. Median age and years since diagnosis was 65 and four years, respectively. For treatment pain rating, the median score was 4.0; for no treatment, the median score was 5.0. Mean score and standard deviation between treatment and control was 4.4 ± 2.1 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1. Vibration stimulation was associated with a statistically significant lower score when controlling for age of patient and number of injected units during treatment (p=0.0198).

Conclusions : Using a handheld facial vibration device is associated with reduction in patient pain during periorbital BOTOX injections for BEB. This can be considered for use in the injection specialist’s armamentarium to improve patient comfort.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×