June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
A 44 channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: laboratory based visual function and functional vision outcomes.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maria Kolic
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Elizabeth K Baglin
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Samuel A Titchener
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Jessica Kvansakul
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Carla J Abbott
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Nick Barnes
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Myra McGuinness
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • William G Kentler
    University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Kiera Young
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Janine Walker
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
    Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Jonathan Yeoh
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • David A X Nayagam
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Chi D Luu
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Lauren N Ayton
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Matthew A Petoe
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Penelope J Allen
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Maria Kolic, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Elizabeth Baglin, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Samuel Titchener, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Jessica Kvansakul, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Carla Abbott, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Nick Barnes, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Myra McGuinness, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); William Kentler, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Kiera Young, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Janine Walker, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Jonathan Yeoh, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); David Nayagam, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Chi Luu, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Lauren Ayton, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Matthew Petoe, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Penelope Allen, Bionic Vision Technologies (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC 1082358
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3168. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K Baglin, Samuel A Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, Carla J Abbott, Nick Barnes, Myra McGuinness, William G Kentler, Kiera Young, Janine Walker, Jonathan Yeoh, David A X Nayagam, Chi D Luu, Lauren N Ayton, Matthew A Petoe, Penelope J Allen; A 44 channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: laboratory based visual function and functional vision outcomes.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3168.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The 44 channel (44Ch) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis is a second-generation bionic eye implant that follows on from a proof of concept study conducted between 2012 and 2014. The 44Ch implant is designed to provide artificial vision (phosphenes) to recipients with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We aimed to compare the performance of visual function and functional vision tasks at pre-implantation and post device activation.

Methods : The 44Ch suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis was unilaterally implanted in 4 participants with advanced RP, age range 39 to 66 years, between February and August 2018. After a 16-week period of vision rehabilitation training, participants were assessed on three laboratory-based visual function tasks: moving bar (MB), square localisation (SL) and grating acuity (GA), followed by three functional vision tasks: table-top search (TTS), doorway detection (DWD) and obstacle avoidance (OA). Assessment time points were pre-implantation and from post-device activation at weeks 17 (W17), W20, W32, W44, W56 and W68. Data was pooled across all 4 participants and performance was compared between device on and off.

Results : With device on, three of the four participants could discriminate MB speeds ranging from 7 to 30 degrees per second. Average pointing error for all four participants, across all visits on SL, was 10.3 ± 3.3° (device on) versus 27.7 ± 8.7° (device off), p < 0.001. Two of the four participants had measurable GA of 0.033 cycles-per-degree. On average, the device improved participants’ ability to locate objects on the TTS, detect and touch the doorway on DWD task and detect and avoid more obstacles during OA, at all-time points post-activation (p<0.04), compared to device off.

Conclusions : The 44Ch second generation suprachoroidal implant improved overall performance on both laboratory-based visual function and functional vision tasks, compared to device off. The device shows the capability to provide visual sensory information, to aid detection of obstacles and improve accuracy when reaching for an object, for people with profound vision loss due to RP.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×