August 2021
Volume 62, Issue 11
Open Access
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   August 2021
Image quality and artifact feedback for fundus imaging using edge device for teleretinal application
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lars Omlor
    Carl Zeiss Inc, California, United States
  • Taylor Shagam
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Simon Bello
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Hugang Ren
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Laura Tracewell
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Bryan Rogoff
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Patricia Sha
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Nolleisha Graves
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Dorothy Hitchmoth
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Mary Kathryn Durbin
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Niranchana Manivannan
    Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lars Omlor, Carl Zeiss Inc. (E); Taylor Shagam, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Simon Bello, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Hugang Ren, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Laura Tracewell, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (C); Bryan Rogoff, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Patricia Sha, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Nolleisha Graves, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (C); Dorothy Hitchmoth, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (C); Mary Durbin, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E); Niranchana Manivannan, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science August 2021, Vol.62, 70. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lars Omlor, Taylor Shagam, Simon Bello, Hugang Ren, Laura Tracewell, Bryan Rogoff, Patricia Sha, Nolleisha Graves, Dorothy Hitchmoth, Mary Kathryn Durbin, Niranchana Manivannan; Image quality and artifact feedback for fundus imaging using edge device for teleretinal application. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(11):70.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : In teleretinal settings, the instruments are operated by technicians who might not have the required expertise to decide whether the image is of sufficient quality for clinical review. Deep neural networks (DNN) have been shown to provide good performance for differentiating good from poor quality images. When the image is flagged as poor quality, it often does not give additional information about the types of artifact. In this project we developed a DNN to classify good/poor images and to give feedback on artifacts.

Methods : This research used retrospective study data of 5059 images acquired using VELARA™ 200 (ZEISS, Dublin, CA) camera. The images were acquired from normal and diseased subjects with various retinal pathologies. The images were graded for image quality (IQ) and presence of artifacts by a minimum of 2 graders and adjudicated by a subject expert. The images were graded for IQ in a 1-5 scale and converted to a binary scale for ground truths (GT) (0:IQ<=2, 1:IQ>2). The following artifacts were also marked in the images: small pupil artifact (SPA) and incorrect fixation artifact (IFA). The development set was split into training (3993 images with 69% good IQ, 16% SPA, and 19% IFA), testing (717 images with 66% good IQ, 16% SPA and 3% IFA) and validation (409 images with 59% good IQ, 17% SPA and 6% IFA).
SqueezeNet is a small DNN that is well suited for low-resource environments lacking GPUs. DNN is modified by adding a residual layer, input channels: RGB image, Hessian determinant, Ridge map and black channel and three-class outputs: IQ, SPA and IFA. The network is trained using weighted cross-entropy to account for class imbalance. The outputs from the DNN are compared with the GTs in test set and performance metrics such as ROC, precision-recall curves, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) are reported.

Results : Figure 1 shows some examples of good and poor quality images. Figure 2 shows the ROC curves for each of the outputs. The proposed DNN achieved accuracies of 91.9%, 94.1% and 94.4% and AUCs of 0.97, 0.98 and 0.94 for IQ, SPA and IFA respectively.

Conclusions : To help provide useful feedback to the untrained operator, we developed a three-class classification using modified SqueezeNet. The results show potential to serve as image quality and artifact detector for teleretinal applications. Future studies will involve collecting more images to fine-tune the performance.

This is a 2021 Imaging in the Eye Conference abstract.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×