In this study, we have shown that in the absence of external stimuli, RBC velocities vary over time by up to 8% in arterioles and venules and up to 20% in capillaries. This variation was observed over both 50-minute and 2.5-hour imaging windows in Experiment 1 and was present on multiple days. The variation in arterioles and venules fall within measurement ranges of previous studies,
18,19 suggesting that RBC velocity variability remains consistent from larger vessels down to the smaller arterioles and venules (<100 µm in diameter). Capillaries, on the other hand, exhibited much larger variations in RBC velocity, with an average CV of 19%. This may arise from numerous factors influencing capillary RBC velocity such as vasomotion,
33–36 local neuronal demand distinct from stimulus responses (i.e., retinal oscillatory potentials
37), or varying local metabolic states of small regions. The smaller size of capillaries makes the velocity of flow within them susceptible to changes in local hematocrit levels, thus increasing viscosity,
38,39 which in turn could contribute to variable velocity and a cycling of flow from high to low values.
40 Retinal neuronal activity is modulated apart from the visual response as evidenced by retinal oscillatory potentials.
37 As the neuronal activity is modulated, the local metabolic requirements must also be. Finally, if each retinal area is locally regulating its blood velocity according to metabolic demand and there are delays in the control system, as there must be due to diffusion, various areas supplied by distinct capillaries interacting both by metabolite diffusion and via upstream pressure effects on the arteriole system would induce instability (i.e., variability). When looking at the velocity at two different time points within a 2-minute acquisition period, a capillary was shown to exhibit increased velocity during one acquisition and decreased velocity in another acquisition, confirming that the variability in velocity occurs, but there was still a normal pulsatile shape, thus this change did not arise from brief interruptions in flow (stasis) arising from temporary leukocyte or rouleaux blockage of flow (
Supplementary Fig. S1). The current data cannot disentangle these various possible factors, as the suggestions are speculative based on the literature.