June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Automated Image Quality Assessment for Spectralis SD-OCT Scans Utilizing Intrinsic Image Features and ML Confidence Score
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kevin Borisiak
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jon Whitney
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Emese Kanyo
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Hasan Cetin
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Michelle Bonnay
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jordan M Bell
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Sunil K Srivastava
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jamie Reese
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Justis P. Ehlers
    Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Ophthalmology, Tony and Leona Campane Center for Excellence in Image-Guided Surgery & Advanced Imaging, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kevin Borisiak None; Jon Whitney None; Emese Kanyo None; Hasan Cetin None; Michelle Bonnay None; Jordan Bell None; Sunil Srivastava Bausch and Lomb, Adverum, Novartis, and Regeneron. , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Regeneron, Allergan, and Gilead, Code F (Financial Support); Jamie Reese None; Justis Ehlers Aerpio, Alcon, Allegro, Allergan, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Thrombogenics/Oxurion, Leica, Zeiss, Regeneron, Santen, Stealth, Adverum, IvericBIO, Apellis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, RegenxBIO, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Aerpio, Alcon, Thrombogenics/Oxurion, Regeneron, Genentech, Novartis, Allergan, Boehringer-Ingelheim, IvericBio, Adverum, Code F (Financial Support), Leica, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH-NEI P30 Core Grant (IP30EY025585) (Cole Eye), Unrestricted Grants from The Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc (Cole Eye), Cleveland Eye Bank Foundation awarded to the Cole Eye Institute (Cole Eye), K23-EY022947-01A1 (JPE), Regeneron
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 199 – F0046. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kevin Borisiak, Jon Whitney, Emese Kanyo, Hasan Cetin, Michelle Bonnay, Jordan M Bell, Sunil K Srivastava, Jamie Reese, Justis P. Ehlers; Automated Image Quality Assessment for Spectralis SD-OCT Scans Utilizing Intrinsic Image Features and ML Confidence Score. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):199 – F0046.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To develop an automated Random Forest (RF) machine learning model for evaluating Spectralis (Heidelberg) SD-OCT image quality.

Methods : This analysis utilized 52 SD-OCT Spectralis SD-OCT scans for training. Each scan was reviewed by two expert graders on a slice-by-slice basis. Each slice was assigned to one of three quality categories (Good, Moderate, Poor), with Good being defined as an image with no quality defects, Moderate being a gradable image with noticeable quality defects, and poor being an ungradable image. Following initial assessment, 4 additional limited quality scans were introduced to provide greater representation of “Poor” quality slice examples. Image features including intensity mean, median, variance, skew, kurtosis, and homogeneity were extracted. In addition to these features, a set of machine learning layer segmentation confidence scores were included in the feature vector for each image.
The computed features were used to train a series of random forest classifiers. To assess the impact of class imbalance on feature training, excess good and moderate scans were filtered from the training folds until a desired class balance (2:2:1) was achieved. Mean AUC scores for each class were computed via One vs. Rest binarization and micro-averaging over 10 independent runs of 5-fold cross validation.

Results : Following initial training, micro-averaged AUC scores of 0.90 ± 0.03, 0.85 ± 0.05, and 0.82 ± 0.12 for Good, Moderate, and Poor, respectively were achieved. Using the expanded dataset with increased representation of poor quality scans, the performance of the classifier on was improved (Good: 0.91 ± 0.06, Moderate: 0.82 ± 0.07, Poor: 0.90 ± 0.06). Class balancing the training sets via a filtering algorithm and including machine learning confidence scores resulted in similar but slightly improved mean AUC metrics (Good: 0.93 ± 0.03, Moderate: 0.84 ± .07, Bad: 0.90 ± 0.05) with more balanced confusion matrices.

Conclusions : The random forest model enabled reliable automated classification of “Good” and “Poor” quality Spectralis OCT images with minimal cross-over between these two classes. This tool has the potential to act as an image quality-gating system by providing rapid feedback during clinical trial image acquisition and advanced image analysis programs.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×