June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Optimal pupil size for near-vision improvement without distance-vision loss in the GEMINI studies of AGN-190584 for presbyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Karl Gene Stonecipher
    Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Milton Hom
    Canyon City Eyecare, California, United States
  • Daniel H Chang
    Empire Eye and Laser Center, Bakersfield, California, United States
  • William Christie
    Scott and Christie Associates, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Jiang Yuan
    Allergan, an AbbVie company, California, United States
  • Haixia Liu
    Allergan, an AbbVie company, California, United States
  • Michael R Robinson
    Allergan, an AbbVie company, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Karl Stonecipher Allergan, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Milton Hom Allergan, an AbbVie company, Code F (Financial Support); Daniel Chang Allergan, an AbbVie company, Code F (Financial Support); William Christie Allergan, an AbbVie company, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Jiang Yuan AbbVie Inc, Code E (Employment); Haixia Liu AbbVie Inc, Code E (Employment); Michael Robinson AbbVie Inc, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 1810 – F0426. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Karl Gene Stonecipher, Milton Hom, Daniel H Chang, William Christie, Jiang Yuan, Haixia Liu, Michael R Robinson; Optimal pupil size for near-vision improvement without distance-vision loss in the GEMINI studies of AGN-190584 for presbyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):1810 – F0426.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : When pupil size reduces, defocus blur and peripheral aberration decrease to improve vision, while diffraction blur increases and retinal illumination decreases to reduce vision. Since reduced pupil size might have a different impact on distance and near vision for people with presbyopia, this exploratory analysis investigated an optimal range of pupil size that improves near vision while minimally impacting distance vision, based on pooled data from individuals who received AGN-190584 for presbyopia in the GEMINI studies.

Methods : The randomized, double-masked, multicenter, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2 studies (N=750 total) evaluated safety and efficacy of AGN-190584 (once daily ophthalmic formulation of pilocarpine HCl 1.25% optimized in a proprietary vehicle [now FDA-approved as Vuity™]) in individuals with presbyopia. At 8 prespecified timepoints on Day 30, distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 4 m, and pupil diameter for the nondominant eye (per Neuroptics’ pupillometer) were assessed in mesopic conditions (10-11 lux at target). Analyses were conducted on pupil size when individuals gained ≥3 lines in DCNVA or lost >5 letters in CDVA from baseline on Day 30, by pupil diameter (using measurements at all 8 timepoints).

Results : At day 30 in individuals who received AGN-190584, a trend suggesting a negative correlation between the change in DCNVA from baseline and pupil size was noted; smaller pupil sizes produced greater DCNVA improvement, with 50.6% (n=40/79), 24.0% (n=116/483), 16.6% (n=63/379), and 12.4% (n=73/588) of individuals gaining ≥3 lines for pupil sizes ≤1.5 mm, >2 to ≤2.5 mm, >3 to ≤3.5 mm, and >4 mm, respectively. However, when the pupil size was ≤2 mm, mesopic CDVA appeared to become compromised, with 4.4% (n=11/250) and 10.7% (n=6/56) of individuals losing >5 letters in CDVA for pupil sizes >1.5 to ≤2.0 mm and ≤1.5 mm, compared with 2.1% (n=7/335), 1.7% (n=5/296), and 4.1% (n=20/483) for pupil sizes >2.0 to ≤2.5 mm, >3.0 to ≤3.5 mm, and >4 mm, respectively.

Conclusions : An optimum pupil size should consider both NVA and DVA as a smaller pupil size benefits NVA, while too small a pupil size can compromise DVA. Our study findings suggest that the optimum pupil size should be between 2.0 and 2.5 mm.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×