June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Evaluating the distribution of laterally corrected foveal avascular zone parameters.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David A Mackey
    Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  • Qiang Li
    Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Peijun Gong
    BRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, The University of Western Australia Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Department of Electrical, Electronic & Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Phuoc Hao Ho
    BRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, The University of Western Australia Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Department of Electrical, Electronic & Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Brendan F Kennedy
    BRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, The University of Western Australia Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Department of Electrical, Electronic & Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Fred Kuanfu Chen
    Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Jason Charng
    Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Optometry, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   David Mackey None; Qiang Li None; Peijun Gong None; Phuoc Hao Ho None; Brendan Kennedy None; Fred Chen None; Jason Charng None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2923 – F0076. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David A Mackey, Qiang Li, Peijun Gong, Phuoc Hao Ho, Brendan F Kennedy, Fred Kuanfu Chen, Jason Charng; Evaluating the distribution of laterally corrected foveal avascular zone parameters.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2923 – F0076.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To examine the distribution and interocular symmetry of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters after correction for lateral magnification, in a large cohort of healthy, young adults.

Methods : Participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including axial length measurement and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging of the macula. OCTA images of combined superficial and deep retinal vessel plexuses were processed via a custom software to extract foveal avascular zone area (FAZA) and vessel density in a 300-µm annulus surrounding the foveal avascular zone (FD-300), with and without correction for lateral magnification. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to examine the effect of lateral magnification on FAZA and FD-300, as well as to evaluate the interocular agreement in both parameters.

Results : OCTA images were acquired in 504 adults (261 females [51.8%], 243 males [48.2%]; average [standard deviation] age: 28.2 [0.7]). The mean (SD) of laterally corrected FAZA and FD-300 were 0.22 (0.10) mm2 and 51.9 (3.2) %, respectively. Relative to raw, uncorrected data, 55.6% of corrected FAZA showed a relative change greater than 5% while all FD-300 changes were within 5%. There was good interocular symmetry (mean OD-OS difference, 95% limits of agreement) in both FAZA (0.006, -0.077 to 0.118 mm2) and FD-300 (-0.05, -5.39 to 5.30 %).

Conclusions : Clinicians should strongly consider accounting for lateral magnification when evaluating FAZA. If working with a 5% error margin, correcting for lateral magnification is not necessary when evaluating FD-300. Good interocular agreement in FAZA and FD-300 suggests the contralateral eye can be used as control data.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×