Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 63, Issue 7
June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Secondary Sutureless Posterior Chamber Lens Implantation with Two Specifically Designed IOLs: Iris Claw Lens versus Sutureless Trans-Scleral Plugs Fixated Lens- Results of a 1 year follow-up
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Donato Colantuono
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Daniel Seknazi
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Agnes Glacet
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Francesca Amoroso
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Alexandra Miere
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Eric Souied
    Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
    Universite Paris-Est Creteil Val de Marne, Creteil, Île-de-France, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Donato Colantuono None; Daniel Seknazi None; Agnes Glacet None; Francesca Amoroso None; Alexandra Miere None; Eric Souied None
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2880 – F0017. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Donato Colantuono, Daniel Seknazi, Agnes Glacet, Francesca Amoroso, Alexandra Miere, Eric Souied; Secondary Sutureless Posterior Chamber Lens Implantation with Two Specifically Designed IOLs: Iris Claw Lens versus Sutureless Trans-Scleral Plugs Fixated Lens- Results of a 1 year follow-up. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2880 – F0017.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The management of patients with aphakia and/or lack of capsular support remains debated. The sutureless posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) fixation is a very useful surgical option. The purpose of the study was to compare the one-year outcomes as well as post-operative best corrected visual acuity, refractive errors and complications of two different techniques of sutureless PCIOL secondary implantation.

Methods : Patients who underwent secondary implantation from December 2019 to January 2022 in the Department of Ophthalmology of Creteil Hospital were retrospectively included. Eyes implanted with the iris claw lens (Artisan Aphakia IOL model 205, Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) were included in group 1, and eyes implanted with a newly developed sutureless trans-scleral plugs fixated lens (STSPFL, Carlevale lens, Soleko, Pontecorvo, Italy) were included in group 2.

Results : Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were enrolled in group 1, and twenty eyes of 20 patients in group 2. No difference was found in visual acuity between two groups (0.38 +/- 0.24 logmar for group 1 and 0.26 +/- 0.54 logmar for group 2) (p = 0.18) at mean post-operative follow up (12.19 +/- 3.44 months for group 1 and 12.42 +/- 3.96 months for group 2) (p = 0.13). Both the mean refractive error (MRE) and induced astigmatism (IA) were greater in group 1 compared to group 2, respectively: the MRE was 0.99 +/- 0.57 vs. 0.46 +/- 0.36 (p < 0.01), and IA was 1.72 +/- 0.96 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.52 (p < 0.01). The most common complications in group 2 were conjunctival erosion (10%) and breakage of the plugs (10%).

Conclusions : No significant differences in terms of the recovery of visual acuity were found between the two groups. Group 2 (STPFL) gives better results in our sample due to less post-operative induced astigmatism and less refractive error.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×