June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
The prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in Taiwanese non-presbyopia adults
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yayu Chen
    Department of Optometry, Da-Yeh University, Dacun, Changhua, Taiwan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yayu Chen None
  • Footnotes
    Support  MOST 109-2314-B-212-002-
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2572 – F0526. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yayu Chen; The prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in Taiwanese non-presbyopia adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2572 – F0526.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Refractive error is associated with binocular vision dysfunctions. Although the myopia rate of young adults in Taiwan has already reached nearly 90%1, the prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in Taiwan is still unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of binocular vision dysfunctions in non-presbyopia adults in Taiwan.

Methods : A total of 107 healthy non-presbyopia adults aged between 20 to 40 years old were included in this study. All participants were corrected refractive errors and examined accommodative tests and binocular vision tests. The collected data were analyzed and categorized into 7 types of vergence dysfunctions and 2 types of accommodative dysfunctions by using the diagnostic criteria of Ma et el.2

Results : The results showed that 48.6% of all participants were normal binocular vision and 51.4% were abnormal binocular vision (including vergence dysfunctions and accommodative dysfunctions). In the vergence dysfunctions, there were 15.0% were basic exophoria (BXO), 8.4% were convergence insufficiency (CI), 5.6% were divergence insufficiency (DI), 3.7% were fusional vergence dysfunction (FVD), 2.8% were basic esophoria (BSO), 1.9% were convergence excess (CE), and 1.9% were divergence excess (DE). In the accommodative dysfunctions, there were 8.4% were accommodative insufficiency (AI) and 3.7% were accommodative infacility (AIF).

Conclusions : In conclusions, this study indicated that 39.3% of the participants were vergence dysfunctions and 12.1% were accommodative dysfunctions. BXO and AI is the most common type in vergence dysfunctions and accommodative dysfunctions, respectively.


1. Ophthalmology, 2021, 128(2): 290-301.
2. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 5904903.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×