Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 63, Issue 7
June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes: Scleral Buckling versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus combined Scleral Buckling/Pars Plana Vitrectomy for primary repair of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Stanton Heydinger
    Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Angeline Wang
    Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Stanton Heydinger None; Angeline Wang None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 3426 – F0326. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stanton Heydinger, Angeline Wang; Comparison of Surgical Outcomes: Scleral Buckling versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus combined Scleral Buckling/Pars Plana Vitrectomy for primary repair of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):3426 – F0326.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The mainstay of treatment for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) has been surgical intervention using various techniques often decided at the level of individual surgeons. While previous research suggests certain approaches may yield better outcomes based upon pre-operative characteristics such as lens status, a superior method has not been elucidated. We performed a retrospective, observational study comparing the outcomes of primary RRD repair using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB), or combined SB with PPV (SB/PPV).

Methods : 179 patients between 2015-2020 with RRD managed at a large university hospital system were included. Outcome measures included: primary anatomical success rate, improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and functional success rate. Primary success was classified as maintained anatomical integrity of the retina following one intervention measured 6 months postoperatively. Functional success was defined as measuring a postoperative BCVA of 20/200 or better. BCVA was converted to logMAR for comparison between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and ANOVA. We excluded patients with: less than 6 months of follow-up, previous retinal surgery, giant retinal tears, aphakia, secondary forms of RRD, or extensive proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Results : SB/PPV yielded the best results in each outcome measure. Primary anatomical success was achieved in 147 of the 179 eyes (82.1%), with SB/PPV showing the greatest success rate (90.3%; p=0.15) amongst the interventions. Functional success was achieved in 125 of the 179 eyes (69.8%), with SB/PPV showing significantly greater functional success (83.9%; p=0.02) than SB (60.0%). SB/PPV showed significantly greater improved mean BCVA (0.87; p=0.04) when compared to SB (0.40); this result held in sub-group analysis of phakic eyes.

Conclusions : SB/PPV yielded the best results for primary anatomical success, functional success, and BCVA improvement out of the three interventions studied. SB/PPV showed significantly better functional success rates (p=0.02) and mean BCVA improvement (p=0.04) when compared to SB. In phakic patients, SB/PPV showed significantly greater BCVA improvement (p=0.03) when compared to SB.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×