June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on visual acuity for diabetic macular edema patients treated with aflibercept in the UK
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Peter H Scanlon
    Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
    Health & Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
  • Charlotte Frances Elizabeth Norridge
    Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
  • Rajarshi Mukherjee
    St James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Andrew J Lotery
    University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Tunde Peto
    Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Romi Chhabra
    Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Clare Bailey
    University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Haralabos Eleftheriadis
    King's College Hospital, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Faruque Ghanchi
    Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
  • Colin Jones
    Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Peter Scanlon Bayer PLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer PLC, Code F (Financial Support), Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient), Topcon, Code R (Recipient); Charlotte Norridge Bayer PLC, Code F (Financial Support); Rajarshi Mukherjee None; Andrew Lotery None; Tunde Peto Optos, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Optomed, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient), Novartis, Code R (Recipient), Roche, Code R (Recipient), Allergan, Code R (Recipient), Oxurion, Code R (Recipient), Heidelberg, Code R (Recipient); Romi Chhabra Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient), Novartis, Code R (Recipient); Clare Bailey Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient), Novartis, Code R (Recipient), Janssen, Code R (Recipient), Roche, Code R (Recipient), Boehringer, Code R (Recipient), Alimera Sciences, Code R (Recipient); Haralabos Eleftheriadis Bayer PLC, Code F (Financial Support), Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient); Faruque Ghanchi Bayer PLC, Code R (Recipient), Novartis, Code R (Recipient), Allergan, Code R (Recipient), Alimera, Code R (Recipient), Alcon, Code R (Recipient), Roche, Code R (Recipient); Colin Jones None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Bayer PLC
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 3776 – F0197. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter H Scanlon, Charlotte Frances Elizabeth Norridge, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Andrew J Lotery, Tunde Peto, Romi Chhabra, Clare Bailey, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Faruque Ghanchi, Colin Jones; Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on visual acuity for diabetic macular edema patients treated with aflibercept in the UK. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):3776 – F0197.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on visual acuity (VA) in eyes treated for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Methods : Anonymized data from 21 UK centers were extracted from Medisoft for eyes receiving treatment with aflibercept and with VA data in the pre-COVID baseline period (01/10/19 to 30/03/20, N=3,248). Comparisons for period 1 (01/04/20 to 30/09/20, N=2,077) – lockdown following RCOphth Medical Retinal Management Plan, period 2 (01/10/20 to 30/03/21, N=1,850) - intermittent lockdown and period 3 (01/04/21 to 30/09/21, N=1,111; 20 centers) - easing of COVID-19 restrictions.
VA change was compared for baseline VA, <7 vs. ≥7 injections before period 1 and for eyes losing ≥5 ETDRS letters in period 1.

Results : The mean change in VA for eyes with a baseline VA of ≤35 letters, was +4.9, +2.5 and +1.7 letters from baseline to period 1, period 1 to 2 and period 2 to 3, respectively. For baseline VA of 36-55 letters, +0.6, +1.7 and -0.2 letters, from baseline to period 1, period 1 to 2 and period 2 to 3, respectively. For baseline VA of 56-75 letters, +1.9, zero and -0.5 letters, from baseline to period 1, period 1 to 2 and period 2 to 3, respectively. For baseline VA of >75 letters, -4.3, -0.5 and zero letters, from baseline to period 1, period 1 to 2 and period 2 to 3, respectively.
For eyes receiving <7 injections before period 1, the mean change in VA was -1.9 letters (N=1,335) from baseline to period 1, +0.5 letters (N=992) from period 1 to 2 and +0.1 letters (N=592) from period 2 to 3. For ≥7 injections before period 1, the mean change in VA was -3.4 letters (N=742) from baseline to period 1, -0.4 letters (N=515) from period 1 to 2 and -1.1 letters (N=303) from period 2 to 3.
For eyes losing ≥5 letters before period 1, the mean change in VA when receiving ≥1 injection in period 2 was +3.9 letters (N=283) from period 1 to 2 and -0.1 letters (N=140) from period 2 to 3. For eyes not retreated in period 2, the mean change in VA was -2.9 letters (N=162) from period 1 to 2 and zero letters (N=73) from period 2 to 3.

Conclusions : Visual gain between time periods was more likely for lower baseline vision. For eyes with <7 or ≥7 injections before period 1, the mean VA change was a loss in vision in the first period with little change in later periods. For eyes with ≥5 letter loss in period 1, subsequent visual gain was more likely if treatment continued.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×