June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
MOSAIC: A qualitative study of the clinical, humanistic, and financial burden of geographic atrophy (GA) among patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Daniel Jones
    Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Jared Nielsen
    Wolfe Eye Clinic PC, Des Moines, Iowa, United States
  • Danielle Altman
    Modus Outcomes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Julia Carpenter-Conlin
    Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Beverly Lui
    Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Patrick Marquis
    Modus Outcomes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Alissa Rams
    Modus Outcomes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Renaud Desgraz
    Apellis Switzerland GmbH, Zug, Switzerland
  • Teya Lovell
    Modus Outcomes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Sujata Sarda
    Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Winfried M K Amoaku
    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Daniel Jones Apellis, Code E (Employment); Jared Nielsen Genentech, Iveric Bio, Kodiak Scientific, Novartis, Regeneron, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Danielle Altman Modus Outcomes, Code E (Employment); Julia Carpenter-Conlin Apellis, Code E (Employment); Beverly Lui Apellis, Code E (Employment); Patrick Marquis Modus Outcomes, Code E (Employment); Alissa Rams Modus Outcomes, Code E (Employment); Renaud Desgraz Apellis Switzerland GmbH, Code E (Employment); Teya Lovell Modus Outcomes, Code E (Employment); Sujata Sarda Apellis, Code E (Employment); Winfried Amoaku Allergan, Apellis, Bioeq, Novartis, UK FRB! , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Allergan, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gyroscope, Novartis, Roche, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Apellis Pharmaceuticals
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4217 – A0145. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Jones, Jared Nielsen, Danielle Altman, Julia Carpenter-Conlin, Beverly Lui, Patrick Marquis, Alissa Rams, Renaud Desgraz, Teya Lovell, Sujata Sarda, Winfried M K Amoaku; MOSAIC: A qualitative study of the clinical, humanistic, and financial burden of geographic atrophy (GA) among patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4217 – A0145.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : GA, the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly; however, there is limited research on patient experiences. We conducted a qualitative study of the clinical, financial, and humanistic burden of GA to characterize patient perspectives on living with the disease. The results of this qualitative study guided the design of a global GA patient survey launched in 2021 and are being presented here for the first time.

Methods : Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 purposively sampled patients in the US (n=22), UK (n=4), and Australia (n=2). Inclusion criteria were age ≥60 years, a diagnosis of GA in at least 1 eye that did not also have neovascular AMD, and English fluency. Patients were excluded if they had neovascular AMD in both eyes, Stargardt disease, major cognitive impairment, or if they were in an AMD clinical trial or on any investigational agent to treat GA. Consensus-based coding and thematic analysis, using a primarily inductive approach, was conducted using ATLAS.ti. Thematic saturation was assessed in 5 waves and achieved in wave 4.

Results : Mean participant age was 80, and 48% of the sample was female. Major clinical burden concerns among patients included the lack of GA treatment and disease information, poor patient-provider communication, unpredictability of progression, and confusion about the difference between GA and wet AMD or other eye conditions. Major humanistic burden concerns included: impacts on mental health; impacts of visual changes on daily activities (reading, driving, shopping, cooking, cleaning, hygiene, personal care, and hobbies); impacts on social and family life. Patients reported the current or threatened loss of independence was their overriding concern. Key markers of independence included: driving, walking in unfamiliar places, and doing daily activities with little assistance. Patients reported personal injuries and driving accidents due to GA and worried about safety. Financial worries included affording products and services for the vision-impaired, job loss, and needing to hire care.

Conclusions : There is a clear significant unmet need for patients beyond therapy, including GA treatment, disease information, and social and mental health support. Further research is needed to understand the clinical, financial, and humanistic burden of GA on patients.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×