June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Assessment of retinal rods and cones function using mesopic full-field stimulus threshold – a preliminary report
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran
    Envision Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Jeff Farmer
    Diagnosys LLC, Massachusetts, United States
  • Ronald A Schuchard
    Envision Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran None; Jeff Farmer Diagnosys LLC, Code E (Employment); Ronald Schuchard None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4063 – F0027. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran, Jeff Farmer, Ronald A Schuchard; Assessment of retinal rods and cones function using mesopic full-field stimulus threshold – a preliminary report. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4063 – F0027.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The main objective of this preliminary study is to test a protocol of mesopic full-field stimulus threshold (mFST) to assess rod and cone function in controls and individuals with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Typically, in scotopic background (BG), thresholds for blue and red FST are distinct, and are used to assess the function of rods and cones, respectively. But it requires pupil dilation and dark adaptation for at least 30min. We hypothesized that distinct thresholds for blue and red FSTs can be achieved by performing mFST without either pupil dilation or dark adaptation.

Methods : mFST at 0.1cd/m2 white BG luminance was measured (ColorDome, Diagnosys LLC) in controls (n=21) and individuals with RP (n=11). In addition, mFST at 1cd/m2 BG luminance was also measured in 10 controls. After adapting to a room light level for at least 10min, FST in two different wavelengths; blue (448nm) and red (627nm) were measured in a dark room. For each wavelength (λ), FST of one eye, with the other occluded, was measured and the test was repeated three times. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD.

Results : In controls, there was a significant main effect of BG [F(1, 10)=257.94, p<0.001], λ [F(1, 10)=561.88, p<0.001] on mFST measured thresholds. Moreover, threshold difference between blue and red mFST using 0.1cd/m2 BG (0.95 log cds/m2) was significantly larger compared to 1cd/m2 (0.22 log cds/m2) BG luminance (p<0.001). This suggested that mFST at 0.1cd/m2 has more distinct blue and red mFST thresholds. On comparing individuals with RP and controls, there was a significant main effect of groups [RP vs. controls: F(1, 19)=18.58, p<0.001]. Individuals with RP had significantly worse thresholds overall compared to controls [blue mFST (p<0.001) and red mFST (p<0.001)]. In addition, threshold difference between blue and red FST in 0.1cd/m2 BG luminance in RP (0.47 log cds/m2) was significantly less than the threshold difference noted in control participants (p<0.001).

Conclusions : mFST at 0.1cd/m2 BG luminance can be used to assess the functions of rods and cones without pupil dilation and dark adaptation. In the future, associations between mFST and other measures such as dark adaptation, low luminance visual acuity and contrast sensitivity should be evaluated for some unique information to consider mFST as an outcome measure in clinical trials and for clinical use.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×