June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Binocular Disparity Selectivity and Orientation Tuning in Mouse V1
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jieming Fu
    Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Seiji Tanabe
    Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Jianhua Cang
    Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
    Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jieming Fu None; Seiji Tanabe None; Jianhua Cang None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH R01EY020950
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4582 – F0444. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jieming Fu, Seiji Tanabe, Jianhua Cang; Binocular Disparity Selectivity and Orientation Tuning in Mouse V1. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4582 – F0444.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The brain combines 2-dimensional images collected by the eyes to form a 3-dimensional representation of its surroundings. This process of stereopsis arises from the binocular integration circuitry in the primary visual cortex (V1) that include neurons tuned to certain disparities between visual stimuli viewed by the two eyes. V1 neurons are also known to be tuned to orientations of visual stimuli. We examined whether these two well-known properties of V1 neurons are related in the mouse, expecting cells tuned to vertical orientations to have the strongest disparity selectivity tuning.

Methods : Adult C57BL/6 mice were surgically fitted with a headplate and had a craniotomy performed over the binocular zone of V1 to facilitate in vivo electrophysiological recording in awake animals. A combined projector and polarizing alternator system was used to display dichoptic visual stimuli. The stimulus set consisted of drifting gratings, in which each binocular condition consisted of a specific combination of orientation and phase disparity, and the associated controls were two monocular conditions at the same orientations. Binocular and monocular conditions were displayed in a randomly interleaved order. A high density 64-channel silicon probe was inserted to collect extracellular voltage signals, which were later sorted into single unit spikes for further analysis.

Results : We acquired a total of 338 single units across 15 animals. Of this population, 107 were significantly responsive to our set of drifting gratings (random permutation test p<0.05). For each neuron, we measured its tuning in the joint parameter space of orientation and phase disparity, as well as its orientation tuning for monocular stimulation. The strength of tuning along the phase disparity axis was quantified using a selectivity index (gPDSI), and orientation corresponding to highest gPDSI was determined. The distribution of orientations corresponding to highest gPDSI was not equally spread among the 4 orientation conditions in the stimulus set (χ2(3)=8.238, p=0.041). However, there was also no significant correlation between gPDSI and preferred orientation (R2=0.001, F(107,105)=0.065, p=0.8).

Conclusions : Binocular disparity selectivity in mouse V1 is not significantly stronger in cells tuned to vertical orientations. Studies utilizing only vertical gratings in their stimulus set may be mis-estimating the prevalence of disparity selective cells in binocular V1.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×