June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Intraocular pressure sensitivity and specificity in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma with Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sean Joseph McCafferty
    Reichert Technologies, Depew, New York, United States
    Intuor Technologies, Tucson, Arizona, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sean McCafferty Reichert, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Intuor Technologies, Code I (Personal Financial Interest)
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 149 – A0342. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sean Joseph McCafferty; Intraocular pressure sensitivity and specificity in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma with Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):149 – A0342.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of IOP in detecting a need for treatment or progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy by loss of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in ocular hypertension (OHT) and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOPg) and modified applanation surface Goldmann tonometry (IOPc)

Methods : A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in a multi-specialty ophthalmology practice on 1741 eyes in 952 patients: 164 N, 502 GS, 490 OHT,491 POAG, and 89 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes. Primary outcome measures included glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) demonstrated by RNFL loss measured by serial OCT over a period of 2.8 years (average of 3.9 visits) to produce receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of sensitivity and specificity with paired IOPc and IOPg measurements. Secondary outcome measures were corneal hysteresis (CH), and central corneal thickness (CCT).

Results : Maximum sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing new onset POAG or NTG using IOPc (77%/91%@23mmHg) and using IOPg (70%/86%@22mmHg)(p<0.001). OHT, being defined by IOP, was included in a separate analysis of those patients with POAG/NTG/OHT requiring treatment (OHT≥26mmHg): IOPc (91%/96%@24mmHg) and IOPg (82%/88%@23mmHg)(p<0.001). An increase of IOPc ≥ 2mmHg over IOPg indicated a 79% probability of progressive GON by RNFL loss in treated POAG/NTG (p<0.001). Likewise, a CH of < 9.0mmHg also indicated 79% probability of progressive GON (p<0.001).

Conclusions : IOP is a primary indicator in the diagnosis of OAG but not significantly reliable alone to make a decision to treat or alter treatment. A modified Goldmann prism demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and specificity diagnosing POAG and NTG as well as directing treatment. IOP remains a valuable leading indicator of GON with significantly high sensitivity and specificity depending upon where in the spectrum of open-angle glaucoma it is measured. The IOP information may be improved by newer methods of measurement.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×