June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence in Vision-Threatening Disease in Clinical and Community Screenings
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aretha Zhu
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Isis Zhang
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Priya Tailor
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Rashika Verma
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Catherine Ye
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Eric Kuklinski
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Bernard Szirth
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Miriam Habiel
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Albert Khouri
    Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Newark, New Jersey, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Aretha Zhu None; Isis Zhang None; Priya Tailor None; Rashika Verma None; Catherine Ye None; Eric Kuklinski None; Bernard Szirth None; Miriam Habiel None; Albert Khouri None
  • Footnotes
    Support  New Jersey Health Institute, Lions Eye Research Foundation of New Jersey
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 1381 – A0077. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aretha Zhu, Isis Zhang, Priya Tailor, Rashika Verma, Catherine Ye, Eric Kuklinski, Bernard Szirth, Miriam Habiel, Albert Khouri; Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence in Vision-Threatening Disease in Clinical and Community Screenings. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):1381 – A0077.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and glaucoma are vision-threatening diseases (VTDs) affecting 36 million people in the USA. With 5.7 ophthalmologists per 100,000 Americans, over 50% of VTDs go undetected. We assessed deep learning Artificial Intelligence (DLAI) in VTD detection in community and clinical settings.

Methods : 223 subjects (mean age 54.6, 58% male) from community screenings (A) and clinic (B) underwent 45-degree retinal imaging. In A (non-dilated), an onsite telemedicine reader (R1) and remote ophthalmologist (R2) graded image quality (gamma and alignment, 1-5 scale) and referable VTD using the international grading scales for AMD and DR, and cup-to-disc ratio and nerve fiber layer for glaucoma. In B (dilated), gradings were collected from R1 and the clinical diagnosis (d). A senior ophthalmologist (R3) adjudicated disputed findings. In A, DLAI VTD referral was compared to R1/R2/R3 consensus (S); in B, overall referral was compared to R1/d/R3 consensus (C). Images were uploaded to a cloud-based DLAI (SELENA+, EyRIS Pte Ltd) (Fig 1). Cohen’s kappa assessed intergrader agreement.

Results : R1 and R2 found 4.7% eyes ungradable. DLAI marked 55.6% ungradable; 74.6% of them were for AMD. Of the DLAI ungradable eyes, image quality was ≤ 3, and 56.2% had ≥ 1+ cataract (R1). Compared to in A, in B DLAI had higher sensitivity (97.1% vs. 63.2%) and positive predictive value (69.4% vs. 32%). In A, DLAI had higher specificity (94.5% vs.16.7%) and negative predictive value (98.4% vs. 75.0%) (Table 1). In A, Cohen’s kappa was 0.946 between R1 and R2, with a 13% disagreement rate. In 56% of the disagreements, R3 agreed with R1. In B, Cohen’s kappa was 0.874 for R1 and d; R1 referred more than d. In A and B, DLAI referred more than R1, R2, and H/C. DLAI referred all eyes with > 1 VTD (1%) for further examination. Grading times for DLAI, R1, and R2 were 30, 129, and 68 seconds.

Conclusions : DLAI performed best in DR and glaucoma detection; a potential solution for the high ungradable rate can be for DLAI to re-center uploaded images. DLAI can increase efficiency and accessibility of screenings for multiple VTDs, in both underserved populations and clinic. The ability to minimize direct contact confers an advantage during COVID-19. Further studies will investigate DLAI use in VTD progression.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Fig 1 Sample report generated by DLAI

Fig 1 Sample report generated by DLAI

 

Table 1 DLAI VTD referral

Table 1 DLAI VTD referral

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×