Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 63, Issue 7
June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Ultrasound biomicroscopy correlation with corneal diameter in pediatric patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Taylor Kolosky
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Anusha U Saga
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Moran Roni Levin
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Janet L. Alexander
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Taylor Kolosky None; Anusha Saga None; Moran Levin None; Janet Alexander None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant KL2TR003099
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4401 – F0080. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Taylor Kolosky, Anusha U Saga, Moran Roni Levin, Janet L. Alexander; Ultrasound biomicroscopy correlation with corneal diameter in pediatric patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4401 – F0080.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Prior studies have established ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) as a clinically valuable imaging modality for structural anterior segment assessment, but its correlation with standard measures of ocular size, such as corneal diameter (CD), has not been examined. CD evaluation is pertinent to cataract surgery planning, and diagnosis and monitoring for congenital conditions such as microcornea, megalocornea, and congenital glaucoma. CD is typically measured using a ruler, calipers, or gray-scale steps devices. These external CD measurements are subject to error and variability, prompting our investigation of measuring corneal dimensions internally from UBM images.

Using a prospective cohort of healthy controls, we tested the hypothesis that CD correlates with internal corneal span determined from the angle-to-angle (AA) distance measured in UBM images.

Methods :
We collected 45 digital external photos and 86 UBM images of a total of 43 eyes from 24 participants between ages 1 – 12 years without ocular disease. We measured horizontal (H) and vertical (V) CD in each external photo using ImageJ software. We also used ImageJ to measure the internal angle-to-angle (AA) distance in H and V cross-sectional UBM images of each eye.

Results : Horizontal and vertical CD and AA measurements were highly positively correlated, as determined by Pearson correlation coefficients of +0.97 and +0.96, respectively. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated high agreement between methods for both H and V measurements (Fig. 1). Regression analysis revealed a linear relationship between CD and AA for H (Fig. 2A, CD = 0.99 x AA + 0.17, R2 = 0.94, P<0.0001) and V (Fig. 2B, CD = 0.96 x AA + 0.44, R2 = 0.92, P<0.0001) measurements.

Conclusions :
UBM image analysis can be used to accurately quantify corneal diameter in children with healthy corneas, as shown by the strong correlation between CD and AA measurements. Given its high resolution and non-invasive nature, UBM may be a useful alternative for determining CD. Further studies are needed to understand the potential to determine CD from AA distance in patients with ocular diseases that may impact the cornea, such as primary congenital glaucoma.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Bland-Altman plots depicting differences between techniques for H (A) and V (B) measurements.

Bland-Altman plots depicting differences between techniques for H (A) and V (B) measurements.

 

CD as a function of AA for H (A) and V (B) measurements.

CD as a function of AA for H (A) and V (B) measurements.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×