June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
High-frequency ultrasound detects biomechanical weakening in keratoconus with a decreasing stiffness at higher grades
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jun Liu
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Sunny Kwok
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Xueliang Pan
    Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Andrew Hendershot
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • William Liu
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jun Liu None; Sunny Kwok None; Xueliang Pan None; Andrew Hendershot None; William Liu None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIHR01EY025358
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4251. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jun Liu, Sunny Kwok, Xueliang Pan, Andrew Hendershot, William Liu; High-frequency ultrasound detects biomechanical weakening in keratoconus with a decreasing stiffness at higher grades. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4251.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : In vivo biomechanical characterization of the cornea remains a challenge. We have developed a high-resolution ultrasound elastography method to measure corneal axial displacement (CAD) induced by the ocular pulse. Here we compared CAD and a stiffness index derived from CAD between keratoconus patients and normal controls. We also explored the trend of these parameters with keratoconus grade.

Methods : Twenty normal controls (40 eyes) and 20 keratoconus patients (35 eyes) were recruited. Each subject underwent three tests: (1) OCULUS Pentacam for corneal topography; (2) PASCAL Dynamic Contour Tonometry for intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and (3) ocular pulse elastography (OPE) for CAD using the Vevo2100 ultrasound system. Corneal topography data was reviewed by a specialist (AH) to determine the presence and grade of keratoconus. Four ultrasound measurements were performed in each eye, and each measurement acquired an 8-second video of the cornea during fixation. This data was processed to obtain the average CAD following published protocols [Kwok et al, TVST, 2020; 9(13):33]. Corneal stiffness index was calculated as OPA/CAD for each eye. Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to account for association between two eyes of the same subject in data analysis.

Results : Mean CAD (unit: µm) was significantly higher (p=0.0088, Fig. 1A) in keratoconus (46.6, 95% CI: 39.2, 53.9) than normal (34.6, 95% CI: 30.1, 39.1). Mean corneal stiffness (unit: mmHg/µm) was significantly lower (p=0.0068, Fig. 1B) in keratoconus (0.0522, 95% CI: 0.0384, 0.066) than normal (0.0804, 95% CI:0.0666, 0.0942). Age and IOP were not different between groups. Overall, mean CAD increased while corneal stiffness decreased at higher keratoconus grade (p=0.002 and 0.011, Fig. 2).

Conclusions : This study confirmed the biomechanical weakening in keratoconus and suggested that this weakening worsened in more severe cases. Ultrasound elastography may provide a quick (minutes) and safe (no applied forces) biomechanical evaluation of the cornea to aid in keratoconus diagnosis.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Fig. 1: A. CAD was significantly higher in keratoconus than normal. B. Corneal stiffness was significantly lower in keratoconus than normal.

Fig. 1: A. CAD was significantly higher in keratoconus than normal. B. Corneal stiffness was significantly lower in keratoconus than normal.

 

Fig. 2: CAD increased significantly while corneal stiffness decreased significantly at higher keratoconus grade.

Fig. 2: CAD increased significantly while corneal stiffness decreased significantly at higher keratoconus grade.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×