June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Characterizing and quantifying image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiograms of normal retinal vasculature
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Minsoo Kim
    Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Xiao Zhou
    University of Washington Department of Bioengineering, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Sahi Nandini Wuppukondur
    Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Xuejuan Jiang
    University of Southern California Department of Ophthalmology, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Ruikang K Wang
    University of Washington Department of Bioengineering, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Amir H Kashani
    Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Minsoo Kim None; Xiao Zhou None; Sahi Wuppukondur None; Xuejuan Jiang None; Ruikang Wang Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code F (Financial Support), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code P (Patent); Amir Kashani Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Code R (Recipient)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH R01EY030564
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2939 – F0092. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Minsoo Kim, Xiao Zhou, Sahi Nandini Wuppukondur, Xuejuan Jiang, Ruikang K Wang, Amir H Kashani; Characterizing and quantifying image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiograms of normal retinal vasculature. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2939 – F0092.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is highly prone to image artifacts which can hinder the interpretation of OCTA images for clinical and research applications. The aim of this study is to develop a feasible method of characterizing and quantifying OCTA artifacts for objective analysis of image quality.

Methods : This was a retrospective study of 3×3 mm2 OCTA scans (CIRRUS HD-OCT 5000) from healthy adult subjects without any major eye diseases. The en face angiogram and structural OCT image from each scan at the superficial retinal layer (SRL) was segmented for analysis. Four types of artifact were defined (decentration, motion artifact, defocus, and shadowing) and manually graded on a scale of 0 (not present), 1 (mild), and 2 (severe) as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. A previously described and validated semiautomated algorithm was used to calculate vessel diameter index (VDI), vessel area density (VAD), vessel skeleton density (VSD), vessel complexity index (VCI), and flux. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the effect of artifact severity on OCTA parameters.

Results : 152 scans from 35 eyes of 19 participants (age 69.4±6.7 yrs, 43.4% male) were included. Severe defocus (Ps<0.001), severe shadowing (Ps<0.001), and mild defocus (Ps<0.01) were negatively correlated with VDI, VAD, VSD, and flux, (range r=[-3.9×10-3]-[-1.6×10-1]). Severe decentration (Ps<0.05) was also negatively correlated with VDI, VAD, and VSD, but not flux, with similar magnitudes. Severe motion artifact was positively correlated with VCI (Ps<0.05, r=1.8×107). VCI was not correlated with any other artifacts. Decentration, motion artifact, and shadowing of mild severity were not correlated with any of the vessel parameters.

Conclusions : The presence of severe decentration, defocus, and shadowing on OCTA scans was found to be quantitatively reflected in the vessel parameters of VDI, VAD, VSD, and flux, while motion artifact was uniquely correlated with VCI. Mild artifacts may not significantly impact most OCTA parameters.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Table 1: Grading rubric for type and severity of OCTA artifacts.

Table 1: Grading rubric for type and severity of OCTA artifacts.

 

Figure 1: Examples of decentration (A), motion artifact (B), defocus (C), and shadowing (D) categorized as severe. Panels A, B, and C show angiograms of the SRL. Panel D shows a structural OCT image. Arrows highlight areas of artifact.

Figure 1: Examples of decentration (A), motion artifact (B), defocus (C), and shadowing (D) categorized as severe. Panels A, B, and C show angiograms of the SRL. Panel D shows a structural OCT image. Arrows highlight areas of artifact.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×