June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Optimizing patient accessibility: patients with decreased vision prefer educational materials in alternative media formats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Garrett N. Manion
    Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Michael Pascoe
    Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, United States
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Shahzad Mian
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Lesley Everett
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Thomas J Wubben
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Anjali Shah
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Grant Comer
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Bradford Tannen
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Nambi Nallasamy
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Christopher Hood
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Benjamin Young
    W K Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Garrett Manion None; Michael Pascoe None; Shahzad Mian None; Lesley Everett None; Thomas Wubben None; Anjali Shah None; Grant Comer None; Bradford Tannen None; Nambi Nallasamy None; Christopher Hood None; Benjamin Young None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2790 – A0120. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Garrett N. Manion, Michael Pascoe, Shahzad Mian, Lesley Everett, Thomas J Wubben, Anjali Shah, Grant Comer, Bradford Tannen, Nambi Nallasamy, Christopher Hood, Benjamin Young; Optimizing patient accessibility: patients with decreased vision prefer educational materials in alternative media formats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2790 – A0120.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Written materials are the dominant medium to convey educational and instructional information to patients. Given the significant proportion of patients with visual impairment in ophthalmology clinics, we hypothesize that these patients would prefer information presented through alternative media formats.

Methods : Patients were recruited from the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center Retina clinics (n=60) who had low vision, were scheduled for retina surgery or their first intravitreal injection, or were from the cornea clinic (n=50) at their pre-operative cataract surgery appointment. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), age, gender, electronic device usage, and previous usage of educational materials were collected. Each patient completed a Likert scale questionnaire to evaluate preference for written, infographic, audio, and video mediums of education. Data were analyzed through two-tailed Student’s t-test. An institutional review board reviewed this study protocol.

Results : Patients with BCVA of 20/50 or worse comprised 50% of the retina clinic and 30% of the cornea clinic participants. Their most preferred medium was audio while least preferred was written. Lower visual acuity positively correlated with preference for audio (p<0.001) and video (p<0.001) mediums while negatively correlating with written (p=0.0004) and infographic (p=0.0024) mediums. Patients with lower visual acuity were also less likely to use written handouts from any physician at prior encounters (p<0.001).
For all patients, video was most preferred and audio least preferred. In patients with BCVA 20/40 or better, written was the most preferred medium.

Conclusions : Patients with visual impairment tend to not use written materials from physicians and prefer alternate mediums of receiving information. Low visual acuity was associated with preference for audio and video over written and infographic mediums, with audio being most preferred. The patient population as a whole preferred video. Further investigation will be needed to see if these mediums are effective for educating visually impaired patients. Physicians may consider investing in alternative educational methods to increase accessibility of information to their patients.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Average Likert scale preference ratings (1-5) of written, infographic, audio, and video mediums are depicted for patient best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) subgroups.

Average Likert scale preference ratings (1-5) of written, infographic, audio, and video mediums are depicted for patient best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) subgroups.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×