June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Five-year visual field outcomes of the HORIZON trial
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Giovanni Montesano
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Giovanni Ometto
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • David P. Crabb
    Optometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Gus Gazzard
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Giovanni Montesano CenterVue, SpA, Italy, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Ivantis, Inc. Irvine, CA, USA, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Giovanni Ometto Ivantis, Inc. Irvine, CA, USA, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Relayer, LTD, London, UK, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); David Crabb Allergan, Apellis, CenterVue, Thea, Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Santen, Allergan, Apellis, CenterVue, Code F (Financial Support), Santen, Medisoft, Code S (non-remunerative); Gus Gazzard Belkin, Genentech, Ivantis, McKinsey, Reichert, Santen, Sight Science, Thea, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Alcon, Allergan, B&L, Belkin, Ellex, Equinox, Genentech, Glaukos, Haag-Streit, Heidelberg, Ivantis, Lumenis, McKinsey, Merck/MSD, Pfizer, Reichert, Santen, Sight Science, Thea, Code F (Financial Support), Alcon, Allergan, B&L, Belkin, Ellex, Equinox, Genentech, Glaukos, Haag-Streit, Heidelberg, Ivantis, Lumenis, McKinsey, Merck/MSD, Pfizer, Reichert, Santen, Sight Science, Thea, Code R (Recipient)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 4383 – A0426. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Giovanni Montesano, Giovanni Ometto, David P. Crabb, Gus Gazzard; Five-year visual field outcomes of the HORIZON trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):4383 – A0426.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the rate of progression (RoP) of visual field (VF) damage between the two arms of the HORIZON prospective randomized multicentre trial

Methods : A total of 556 participants (one eye per participant) were randomised 1:2 to receive cataract surgery alone (CS, n = 187) or in combination with a Hydrus Microstent (Ivantis, Inc. Irvine, CA; CS-HMS, n = 369). Patients followed for 5 years had planned VF tests at baseline and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA, Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), 24-2 pattern, SITA-Standard strategy. Additional tests were performed if a worsening in mean deviation of 2.5 dB or more was observed. A total of 3701 VF from 554 (99.6%) patients were available for analysis. Of these, 121 VFs were excluded due to poor reliability (false positive rate > 15%). To eliminate any effects of cataract on VF, pre-surgery baseline tests were excluded from the analysis (561 reliable VFs). We analysed eyes with at least 3 VFs available over at least one year (165 CS and 352 CS-HMS, 2966 VFs). A secondary more inclusive analysis was conducted on all eyes with at least 2 VFs (177 CS and 361 CS-HMS, 3008 VFs). The difference in RoP between the two groups was estimated using a hierarchical mixed effect Bayesian model, modelling point-wise sensitivity values grouped by location, Garway-Heath clusters, eye (all random effects) and arm of the trial (fixed effect). A statistically significant difference in RoP was tested via an interaction term between the effect of the arm assignment and the time from surgery. Significance was reported using a Bayesian p-value. Estimates of the effect are reported, along with 95% Bayesian Credible Intervals.

Results : There was no significant difference in the estimated baseline (intercept of the model) between the two arms, either with the main or secondary analysis. The RoP was -0.26 [-0.36, -0.16] dB/year (47%) slower in the CS-HMS arm (p = 0.0138) in the main analysis and -0.23 [-0.40, -0.05] dB/year (43%, p = 0.0284) in the secondary analysis. Numerical results are reported in Table 1 and Figure 1.

Conclusions : CS-HMS significantly reduced the speed of VF loss compared to CS alone in glaucoma patients by a clinically significant amount.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×