June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Deep-learning-based volumetric quantification of retinal lesions in murine model of focal laser injury
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jose de Jesus Rico-Jimenez
    Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Dewei Hu
    Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Edward M Levine
    Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Ipek Oguz
    Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Yuankai Tao
    Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jose Rico-Jimenez None; Dewei Hu None; Edward Levine None; Ipek Oguz None; Yuankai Tao None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant R01-EY030490; NIH Grant R01-EY031769
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2059 – F0048. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jose de Jesus Rico-Jimenez, Dewei Hu, Edward M Levine, Ipek Oguz, Yuankai Tao; Deep-learning-based volumetric quantification of retinal lesions in murine model of focal laser injury. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2059 – F0048.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Focal laser retinal injury models are a robust platform for in vivo testing of retinal regeneration strategies. However, quantitative assessment of the retinal structural changes resulting from laser photodamage is prohibitively labor-intensive, requiring manual segmentation of longitudinal volumetric datasets. Here, we present a deep-learning based approach for automated qualitative assessment of lesion volumes using OCT images to enable real-time assessment of injury severity and longitudinal tracking of tissue response to photodamage.

Methods : In vivo OCT retinal imaging was performed longitudinally to track retinal injury response and analyze the reproducibility of retinal photodamage in murine models. Lesions with different severity were induced by varying the laser pulse duration, pulse power, and number of pulses. OCT images were denoised using self-fusion and fed into a convolutional neural network to segment lesion cross-sections. The network was trained to quantify photodamage between the outer plexiform layer (OPL) and retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) accurately without the need for extensive image pre- and post-processing. The consensus of manually labeled OCT cross-sections from two independent image annotators were used as ground-truth.

Results : The automated method was compared against the manual segmentation using the Dice coefficient achieving a score of 0.91 for training and 0.87 for testing. Figure 1 shows high degree of spatial co-registration between the manual (B) and automated lesion segmentation (C). Likewise, projections of lesion height of manually (E) and automatically (F) segmented lesions overlaid on the OCT en face projections demonstrate that both methods are well-correlated.

Conclusions : Automated volumetric OCT segmentation enables efficient and robust quantification of lesion severity after laser delivery and during longitudinal follow-up. The proposed approach will allow for large-scale quantitative injury studies by eliminating the need of burdensome manual lesion segmentation. While promising, this initial proof-of-concept study will need to be validated on larger comparative studies with multi-grader segmentations that evaluate benefits in segmentation sensitivity and specificity.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

OCT cross-sections after lesioning (A) with manual (B) and automated segmentation (C). OCT en face (D) with lesion heights in (E) manually and (F) automatically segmented.

OCT cross-sections after lesioning (A) with manual (B) and automated segmentation (C). OCT en face (D) with lesion heights in (E) manually and (F) automatically segmented.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×