June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Mixed reality headset with obstacle detection software (CU glasses) for improving orientation and mobility in the blind: a pilot study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sirin Triwutpipatkul
    Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine , Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Rath Itthipanichpong
    Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine , Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Bharkbhum Khambhiphant
    Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine , Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sirin Triwutpipatkul None; Rath Itthipanichpong None; Bharkbhum Khambhiphant None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 718 – F0446. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sirin Triwutpipatkul, Rath Itthipanichpong, Bharkbhum Khambhiphant; Mixed reality headset with obstacle detection software (CU glasses) for improving orientation and mobility in the blind: a pilot study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):718 – F0446.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To develop a mixed reality (MR) headset with the customized obstacle detection software and voice guided navigation (CU glasses) for avoiding indoor obstacles using a spatial mapping technique and compare its performance with a white cane.

Methods : Ten normal sighted people aged 29-65 years were recruited into this pilot, cross-sectional study. The experiment room was set up with ten soft non-harmful obstacles including 4 face-level, 3 trunk-level and 3 knee-level obstacles. All subjects were blindfolded and trained to use both the CU glasses (CUG) and a white cane (WC) before entering the experiment room. All subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups (CUG or WC) and walked through the 10 obstacles from entrance (point A) to exit (point B) one by one. After that all subjects were switched the group and walk through the 10 obstacles once again from point B to point A. The number of bumping into obstacles and time from entrance to exit were recorded.

Results : The CUG group had lower number of obstacles hit compared with the WC group
The mean (SD) number of obstacles hit of the CUG group, and the WC group was 0.7 (+/- 0.48) and 1.4 (+/-0.84) respectively. The mean difference (95% CI) of number of obstacles hit between 2 groups was 0.7 (0.12, 1.27), p=0.016. The total time (SD) from start to finish of the CUG group and the WC group was 5.18 (+/-3.42) and 3.21 (+/-2.78) minutes respectively. The mean difference (95% CI) was 1.97 (-4.39, 0.45), p=0.111. All subjects completed the test without any falls or injuries.

Conclusions : The CU glasses can decrease the number of obstacles hit compared with white cane in our indoor experimental environment. Further studies in the blind subjects are needed to assess its full potential as an assistive device for improving orientation and mobility for the blind.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×