June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
FIJI-assisted automatic quantitative volumetric analysis of CNV in a laser-induced CNV mouse model
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Arjun Nanda
    The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Dimitrios Pollalis
    Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Sun Young Lee
    Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    Physiology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Arjun Nanda None; Dimitrios Pollalis None; Sun Young Lee None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources (OSCTR) Pilot Program. National Eye Institute Vision Core Grant P30EY021725. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., to the OUHSC Department of Ophthalmology.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 3052 – F0423. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arjun Nanda, Dimitrios Pollalis, Sun Young Lee; FIJI-assisted automatic quantitative volumetric analysis of CNV in a laser-induced CNV mouse model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):3052 – F0423.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Accurate and precise as well as efficient measurements of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions are important in the laser-induced CNV mouse model, one of the major animal models used in developing therapeutic agents for various neovascular retinal diseases. We present the utility of FIJI-assisted automatic quantification of the total volume of CNV.

Methods : Laser-induced CNV was induced in C57BL/6J mice according to the established protocol. Following CNV induction, mice were treated with intravitreal injection of either PBS (n=6-7) or aflibercept (Eylea®) (n=11). One week after treatment, RPE/choroid flat mounts were stained with rhodamine-conjugated Griffonia simplicifolia lectin B4 (GSA). Z-stacks of the entire CNV lesion obtained using laser confocal microscopy were converted to binary stacks using FIJI. Thresholded voxels were quantified using the Voxel-Counter Plugin. Data from volumetric analysis and multiple area analyses from blindly selected, mean, and a maximum of measured areas using FIJI were compared.

Results : FIJI-assisted automatic quantitative volumetric analysis of CNV was useful in detecting experimental outliers in laser-induced CNV genesis and provided accurate and precise measurements of total areas of CNV with a lower coefficient of variance (63%) than in multiple area analyses, including blindly selected, mean, and a maximum of measured areas (76%, 69%, and 67% respectively). A lower coefficient of variance resulted in increased statistical significance (p-value) when comparing CNV lesions in PBS and Eylea treated groups (Figure).

Conclusions : FIJI-assisted automatic quantitative volumetric analysis can be useful for accurate, precise and efficient measurements of total areas of CNV. Further, this approach can be advantageous in determining the efficacy of therapeutic agents in the laser-induced CNV mouse model.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Figure. 3D reconstruction of CNV compared to the axial plane representation of blindly selected, mean, and maximum areas of neovessels (A). Comparison of normalized measurements of CNV lesions in control (PBS) and Eylea groups between different analysis methods (B).

Figure. 3D reconstruction of CNV compared to the axial plane representation of blindly selected, mean, and maximum areas of neovessels (A). Comparison of normalized measurements of CNV lesions in control (PBS) and Eylea groups between different analysis methods (B).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×