June 2022
Volume 63, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2022
Higher Macular Pigment Levels are Associated with Better Contrast Sensitivity and Photostress Recovery Time in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma Supplemented with Carotenoids
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aoife Mary Louise Hunter
    Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Ekaterina Loskutova
    Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Gareth Lingham
    Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Colm J O'Brien
    Department of Ophthalmology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  • John S Butler
    Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • James Loughman
    Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Aoife Hunter None; Ekaterina Loskutova None; Gareth Lingham None; Colm O'Brien None; John Butler None; James Loughman None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2022, Vol.63, 2699 – A0063. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aoife Mary Louise Hunter, Ekaterina Loskutova, Gareth Lingham, Colm J O'Brien, John S Butler, James Loughman; Higher Macular Pigment Levels are Associated with Better Contrast Sensitivity and Photostress Recovery Time in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma Supplemented with Carotenoids. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63(7):2699 – A0063.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the relationship between macular pigment optical volume (MPOV) and contrast sensitivity (CS), microperimetric pointwise sensitivity (PWS) and photostress recovery time (PRT) during 18 months of carotenoid supplementation in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods : MPOV was measured (central 6°) in one eye using fundus autofluorescence (Spectralis HRA + OCT) in 54 patients with OAG, randomised to receive treatment (10 mg lutein, 10 mg meso-zeaxanthin, 2 mg zeaxanthin, n = 37 [mean age: 66.2 years, range: 48 – 86]) or placebo (n = 17 [mean age: 61.8 years, range: 36 – 76]) supplementation. CS was measured at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (3 cd/m2) conditions, each with and without glare (Functional Vision Analyzer). Area under log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated for each test condition. PWS at 19 visual field locations (central 10°, MAIA 2) and PRT (MDD-2 Macular Adaptometer) were also measured. All tests were conducted at six monthly intervals from baseline to 18 months. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess relationships between each visual function measure (response variables: AULCSF, PWS and PRT) and MPOV (fixed effect) over time. Treatment, time and adaptation condition (AULCSF) were included as fixed effects and participant as a random effect to adjust for such factors in the model.

Results : Positive significant relationships were observed between AULCSF (all adaptation conditions) and both MPOV (Beta coefficient [β] = 0.013, P = 0.028, fig. 1a) and time (β = 0.035, P = 0.011). PRT had a significant inverse association with MPOV (β = -0.924, P = 0.045, fig. 1b) and a significant positive association with time (β = 3.78, P=0.019). PWS was not significantly related to MPOV (β = -0.077, P = 0.203, fig. 1c) or time (β = 0.036, P = 0.819).

Conclusions : Patients with OAG and higher MPOV exhibited better CS under mesopic and photopic conditions both with and without glare. PRT was faster in those exhibiting higher MPOV over the supplementation period. Visual function may be improved in glaucoma by increasing MPOV through carotenoid supplementation, but further work is required to determine its longer-term effects on visual function.

This abstract was presented at the 2022 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Denver, CO, May 1-4, 2022, and virtually.

 

Fig. 1: Relationships between MPOV and (a) AULCSF, (b) PRT and (c) PWS

Fig. 1: Relationships between MPOV and (a) AULCSF, (b) PRT and (c) PWS

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×